#3988965 - 07/31/14 05:21 PM
27,000 new pilots a year - Boeing
|
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,144
jdbecks
Room Clear!
|
Room Clear!
Member
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,144
England
|
If Boeing say they need to hire 27,000 new pilots a year globally until 2033, to keep up with forecasted demand in the number of flights. Why don't airlines do more to hire new pilots? As someone with no experience within the aviation industry it seems the only way to be a pilot is with huge financial outlay with no guarantee of a job? If the industry is facing this much of a potential staffing industry should the airlines not do more to recruit and train pilots? http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/jobs/11000803/Half-a-million-new-pilots-needed-says-Boeing.htmlI understand it's expensive to train pilots, however the aviation industry is not the only industry to incur high training costs. If someone could explain it to me please as I say I don't know how the industry is.
|
|
#3988972 - 07/31/14 05:26 PM
Re: 27,000 new pilots a year - Boeing
[Re: jdbecks]
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 11,072
semmern
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 11,072
Oslo, Norway
|
Ah yes, the Great Pilot Shortage Myth. It's been around for 40 years. Flight schools love it.
In all my years I've never seen the like. It has to be more than a hundred sea miles and he brings us up on his tail. That's seamanship, Mr. Pullings. My God, that's seamanship!
|
|
#3988977 - 07/31/14 05:33 PM
Re: 27,000 new pilots a year - Boeing
[Re: jdbecks]
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 11,072
semmern
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 11,072
Oslo, Norway
|
As someone with no experience within the aviation industry it seems the only way to be a pilot is with huge financial outlay with no guarantee of a job? If the industry is facing this much of a potential staffing industry should the airlines not do more to recruit and train pilots?
Yep, too many people, too few jobs. It has become the norm for new pilots to have to spend huge amounts of money on buying their own type rating after having spent huge amounts of money getting their licenses in the first place. The most cheapskate of the low-cost airlines are to blame - here in Europe the airlines primarily responsible for the downward spiral of terms and conditions for pilots are Ryanair, EasyJet and Norwegian. I don't know as much about the situation in the US, but the so-called "race to the bottom" has already claimed lives: See the Colgan Air Dash 8 crash in Buffalo, NY.
In all my years I've never seen the like. It has to be more than a hundred sea miles and he brings us up on his tail. That's seamanship, Mr. Pullings. My God, that's seamanship!
|
|
#3989014 - 07/31/14 06:51 PM
Re: 27,000 new pilots a year - Boeing
[Re: zxrex]
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 121,384
PanzerMeyer
Pro-Consul of Florida
|
Pro-Consul of Florida
King Crimson - SimHQ's Top Poster
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 121,384
Miami, FL USA
|
We're experiencing a pilot shortage in our area. We are having a hard time finding pilots for our charter operation. I think it is a shortage of pilots willing to work for the poor pay and on call lifestyle. I know 3 guys who gave up flying for a living and are making more money and are enjoying the time with their family. Yeah this makes perfect sense to me. It's a shame really just how much the profession of airline pilot has changed in our society over the past 50 years or so.
“Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster. And if you gaze long enough into an abyss, the abyss will gaze back into you.”
|
|
#3989031 - 07/31/14 07:25 PM
Re: 27,000 new pilots a year - Boeing
[Re: semmern]
|
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 957
Chaz
For Whom the Bell Tolls
|
For Whom the Bell Tolls
Member
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 957
|
Ah yes, the Great Pilot Shortage Myth. It's been around for 40 years. Flight schools love it. +1 This "shortage" pitch was going around 1 year after 9/11..... when there were thousands of furloughed pilots.
|
|
#3989071 - 07/31/14 09:27 PM
Re: 27,000 new pilots a year - Boeing
[Re: semmern]
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,000
bonchie
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,000
|
Ah yes, the Great Pilot Shortage Myth. It's been around for 40 years. Flight schools love it. There's no shortage at the majors. For sure. But there are already documented shortages, leading to cancellations, at the regionals. And with the new 1500 hour ATP rule, it's going to be really really tough to fill the ranks at the regionals going forward for 25k a year and a crappy schedule. The mountain of time now needed just to get in the door, at poverty wages no less, is only going to discourage people from even pursuing flying as well.
|
|
#3989093 - 07/31/14 10:32 PM
Re: 27,000 new pilots a year - Boeing
[Re: jdbecks]
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 11,072
semmern
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 11,072
Oslo, Norway
|
The 1500h FAA requirement was a knee-jerk reaction to the Colgan Air accident, where, ironically, both pilots had more than enough hours..they were just overworked and fatigued due to the lifestyle required of pilots today, especially in the regional end of flight operations, but also in many major low-cost companies. Training standards have fallen, any douchebag with enough money can get a job, not based on skills and knowledge, but based on how much you're willing to pay, and the main culprit is the insanely low ticket prices that Joe Public has come to expect. It actually costs a lot of money to keep a pressurised, kerosene-fueled metal tube with two or four jet engines in the air at five miles above the Earth's surface, and there is something wrong with the state of things, IMO, when pilot wages keep getting slashed, fuel prices keep rising, and still the tickets are as cheap as they are. Cheaper, dollar for dollar, than they were 20 years ago. Ticket prices need to rise a bit, the airlines need to make a better profit, so they can pay people wages that aren't insultingly low, and the public needs to accept slightly higher ticket prices to reflect the actual costs of operating airplanes in a safe manner.
In all my years I've never seen the like. It has to be more than a hundred sea miles and he brings us up on his tail. That's seamanship, Mr. Pullings. My God, that's seamanship!
|
|
#3989098 - 07/31/14 10:40 PM
Re: 27,000 new pilots a year - Boeing
[Re: jdbecks]
|
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 24,029
oldgrognard
Administrator
|
Administrator
Lifer
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 24,029
USA
|
Ahhhhhhhh.... The FAA . Their motto is - "we're not happy until you're not happy.
Good people sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.
Someday your life will flash in front of your eyes. Make sure it is worth watching.
|
|
#3989131 - 08/01/14 12:28 AM
Re: 27,000 new pilots a year - Boeing
[Re: jdbecks]
|
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,509
Deacon211
Senior Member
|
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,509
Louisville, KY
|
Semmern, I couldn't have said it better myself. I do have hopes that the plunging pilot pay will degrade the profession enough where reform will be impossible to avoid and a first year pilot at Delta won't make less than a hairdresser in DC. I do think the fallout from the age 67 rule and the 1500 hour requirement will require an influx of pilots who will not work for $16K (the starting salary at Comair when I applied in 1999). Perhaps the profession will normalize a bit into one worth pursuing again.
Grognard, I hear your sentiments. EDIT: actually, I kind of agreed with Grognard's and by extension, Semmern's statements, but after researching it a bit I think the 1500 hour rule stemmed chiefly from this statement from the NTSB report made by vice chairman Christopher Hart...
"Pilot Professionalism
In the sunshine meeting I stated my concern that our commercial aviation system is experiencing a declining percentage of airline pilots who have the benefit of military pilot training, and our system is not adequately responding to the challenges that are being created by that decline. Not only is military training world-class, but the military has a long history of effectively weeding out those who simply lack the right stuff.
This is not to say that pilots cannot get world‐class training in our civilian system; but that system needs, among other things, a more effective weeding process. Currently the pilot licensing process is based upon passing various written and flight tests but there is no distinction between those who pass the first time, versus those who dont pass until the third time, versus those who dont pass until the ninth time. Most of what most attorneys do is not potentially life-threatening for their clients, yet some states limit the number of times that lawyers to be can fail the bar exam. In addition, I am aware of at least one mode of transportation in which failure to pass a critical written test the second time results in dismissal from the program, and passing the test requires a score of 100.
Similarly, there is no distinction in our civilian system between those who pass flight tests the first time versus those, such as the captain in this accident, who failed the first attempt in several different flight tests.
Moreover, written tests largely measure knowledge, and flight tests largely measure stick and rudder skills. Other crucial attributes are not generally measured by either of these tests, such as discipline and judgment two attributes for which the effectiveness of military training is also well known, but that have also been shown lacking in this and other recent commercial aviation accidents and incidents.
Our civilian system needs to address the challenge of systematically continuing to provide the world-class pilot training that the military has provided for so many years, and the system particularly needs a better way to keep out those who should not begin or continue flying passengers for hire."
Personally, I have flown with both mil and civilian pilots and have found both good and bad ones in both categories. I think however, reading the accident report, there is some validity to the argument that coming to a carrier with a few hundred hours in light civils or twins is, potentially, learning at the expense of the passengers.
Sorry for the aside...not really on the original topic.
|
|
#3989166 - 08/01/14 02:05 AM
Re: 27,000 new pilots a year - Boeing
[Re: jdbecks]
|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 10,113
KraziKanuK
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 10,113
Ottawa Canada
|
Which military pilot, fighter jock or transport, would be preferred?
There was only 16 squadrons of RAF fighters that used 100 octane during the BoB. The Fw190A could not fly with the outer cannon removed. There was no Fw190A-8s flying with the JGs in 1945.
|
|
|
|