#3880275 - 12/19/13 08:50 PM
Re: Question for Americans
[Re: Rodney]
|
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 2,785
Wallimiyama
Senior Member
|
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 2,785
Just south of the North Pole (...
|
I love taking the train...
My dad worked for the Burlington Northern (Later BNSF)for 41 years before retiring.
Wally -Are we havin' fun yet?
|
|
#3880276 - 12/19/13 08:54 PM
Re: Question for Americans
[Re: Rodney]
|
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 10,576
Arthonon
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 10,576
California
|
I've ridden on trains, but mostly for the novelty of it. Years ago, when I was a kid, our family took a ride on a steam train in Alaska called "The Moose Gooser." I've also ridden on the Alaska Railroad a few times, but never as any real transportation, and just to enjoy the ride.
I think part of the problem with train travel in the US is that the way most cities are structured, you still need a car at your destination, so it's just easier to drive your car over the nice highways than take a train. Train travel is usually fairly expensive, too.
|
|
#3880283 - 12/19/13 08:57 PM
Re: Question for Americans
[Re: Rodney]
|
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 22,405
letterboy1
(Heterosexual)Tchaikovsky Ballet Fan
|
(Heterosexual)Tchaikovsky Ballet Fan
Lifer
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 22,405
Columbus, GA USA
|
Rodney, "railroad ticket" might be a bit unusual, but "taking the train," "going by train," and "train ticket" are all so intuitive that I doubt any American would not immediately understand what is being talked about. When it comes to the disparity in our ways of speaking, it tends to show more for example in your automotive words like "boot" instead of our "trunk" or "bonnet" instead of our "hood."
The issue is not p*ssy. The issue is monkey.
|
|
#3880315 - 12/19/13 09:41 PM
Re: Question for Americans
[Re: Rodney]
|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 10,113
KraziKanuK
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 10,113
Ottawa Canada
|
Had to give the car 'the boot' when it wouldn't start, back in the day. ???
There was only 16 squadrons of RAF fighters that used 100 octane during the BoB. The Fw190A could not fly with the outer cannon removed. There was no Fw190A-8s flying with the JGs in 1945.
|
|
#3880324 - 12/19/13 09:57 PM
Re: Question for Americans
[Re: Rodney]
|
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 5,534
Alicatt
Hotshot
|
Hotshot
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 5,534
Ice Cold in Alex or Eating in ...
|
Only train I took in the US was the automatic one at New Jersey Airport, Always wanted to go across the Rockies in the observation car on a train. Just this week we started to get Railroad - Alaska on the TV here, now that drop down in towards Anchorage from Seward, a 3% (about 1:30 for us Brits) grade is pretty steep! In the UK I was a regular on the sleeper from London to Inverness, north bound on a Friday and back to London on the Sunday, Also used to take "The Highlander" the 12:00 from Kings Cross to Inverness, got to know the staff on board over the years and was very sad when my favourite chef Paul Taylor was killed in the train wreck when the guy fell asleep at the wheel of his car and crashed on to the railway track in front of the London Express. [video:youtube] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LTdIdE-ipRM#t=110[/video]
Chlanna nan con thigibh a so's gheibh sibh feoil Sons of the hound come here and get flesh Clan Cameron
|
|
#3880454 - 12/20/13 03:06 AM
Re: Question for Americans
[Re: Rodney]
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 6,523
Tarnsman
Hotshot
|
Hotshot
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 6,523
USA
|
I've taken the train quite a bit in the US and Canada. Not counting subways and commuters which are routine for me, Ive hopped between cities a lot and overland a couple of times. Traveling between nearby cities the train is more convenient than flying or driving and far more comfortable than the bus. I do wish I had lived in the great age of Rail however, it looks swank and classy. A cigarette a cocktail a smart brunette and 12 hours to kill.
|
|
#3880477 - 12/20/13 04:08 AM
Re: Question for Americans
[Re: Arthonon]
|
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,401
Smosh
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,401
Gisborne, New Zealand
|
"Bonnet" I get, because it's about the same as a hood, although a bit feminine sounding. "Boot" is a mystery to me, though. I thought "trunk" came from the fact that early cars had trunks strapped to the rear to carry things, so I can see that just carrying over, but I have no idea where "boot" came from for that. Apparently "boot" was the name of a built-in compartment on a horse drawn carriage. It was originally a seat for the coachman and later for storage.
Rabbits, break right and climb.
|
|
#3880493 - 12/20/13 05:52 AM
Re: Question for Americans
[Re: Rodney]
|
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 5,205
Skycat
Hotshot
|
Hotshot
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 5,205
Pennsylvania or Montana
|
I think the observation that most Americans have never travelled by train is correct, if you exclude inner city commuter lines (ie, the subway, 'tubes', the L, the BART, etc.), short line 'historic' tourist attractions, and the rides at Disney World. I mean travelling by rail in the classic sense: watching farmland and mountains roll by the window while on your way to a distant city. The standard setting of spy thrillers, murder mysteries, and Bogart films. A romantic memory of a bygone era.
America still has an expansive rail network across the continent. However, most of it is for freight only. If you look at the routes offered by Amtrak, the major passenger carrier in the U.S., the lines are very limited and primarily connect major cities. Case in point, last year my mother wanted to travel from Tampa, Florida to Houston, Texas. She hates air travel and isn't comfortable driving herself long distances, so she chose Amtrak. To accomplish this trip, she had to take a bus to Orlando to catch a train going north to Washington D.C. From there she took a second train to Chicago. Finally, a third train south to Dallas, where my aunt met her and took her to Houston. A week later she did the whole trip in reverse.
I've never taken a cross country trip like that on a train. There is an Amtrak line approximately 100 miles north of me that passes through the Rocky Mountains to Seattle. I might take that ride someday to visit a friend who lives in Seattle, though driving the 700 miles each way would feel more natural to me.
|
|
#3880526 - 12/20/13 09:00 AM
Re: Question for Americans
[Re: Rodney]
|
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 5,534
Alicatt
Hotshot
|
Hotshot
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 5,534
Ice Cold in Alex or Eating in ...
|
There are not that many high-speed lines in the US, and with the way regulations are written the majority of the passenger trains are limited to 79mph, the major exception is the North East Corridor between Boston and Washington where the lines and rolling stock can do up to 140mph. At 80mph and above a whole new set of tougher rules about in-cab signalling comes into effect. More info here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-speed_rail_in_the_United_States
Chlanna nan con thigibh a so's gheibh sibh feoil Sons of the hound come here and get flesh Clan Cameron
|
|
#3880624 - 12/20/13 01:43 PM
Re: Question for Americans
[Re: adlabs6]
|
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 49,716
Jedi Master
Entil'zha
|
Entil'zha
Sierra Hotel
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 49,716
Space Coast, USA
|
What is really interesting, is that it would seem that many people having never used a train is a relatively recent situation. Nearly every little town I've lived in or near has old, overgrown, and disused rail tracks. Very often, there is (or was, early in the 20th century) a rail passenger station in town. Of those old rail passenger stations that survive, many have been turned into area museums, displaying bits of local history.
Going back 70 to 100 years, given the infrastructure I know existed then from historical archives (and much still exists in ruins today) would have let residents of little rural towns take a train all the way into Dallas, around 100 miles one way.
Cars, good roads, and cheap gas replaced it all. It's interesting to observe how many of the rural lifestyles that have been created by this situation are really unsustainable. Back when gasoline was high and causing a crunch, I knew a good number of middle class people who did a 140 to 160 mile (round trip) daily drive into DFW who had to sell their rural homes and move nearer to their work. Yeah, if you live in an older area. Around Florida trains were never the primary means of transport other than along the east coast going all the way down to Key West. The west coast, Orlando (which pretty much was nothing before the 70s), and most of the newer communities are all post-rail developments. As it is, the railroad is a MAJOR PITA here. They hold up road expansion because of their "liabilities" so we get stuck with 2-lane roads crossing it where we need 4. The Jedi Master
The anteater is wearing the bagel because he's a reindeer princess. -- my 4 yr old daughter
|
|
#3881292 - 12/21/13 04:48 PM
Re: Question for Americans
[Re: Rodney]
|
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,231
HogDriver
Retired Flight Simmer
|
Retired Flight Simmer
Member
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,231
|
I say "I'm taking the train". And yes "train ticket".
"Railroad" is a really outdated word in terms of general public usage. It's more like "line, or rail line" now. Example, "the Midland line" for the tracks going to Midland.
I refuse to buy a flight sim that I have no interest in playing, on the off chance that MAYBE someday they'll make the one I really want to play.
|
|
#3882291 - 12/23/13 01:06 PM
Re: Question for Americans
[Re: Rodney]
|
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 49,716
Jedi Master
Entil'zha
|
Entil'zha
Sierra Hotel
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 49,716
Space Coast, USA
|
I think if you say "railroad" you're likely to be taking a steam-powered trip! The rails are the same, but depending on the tech/age/era taking you around...
The Jedi Master
The anteater is wearing the bagel because he's a reindeer princess. -- my 4 yr old daughter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exodus
by RedOneAlpha. 04/18/24 05:46 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|