#3750583 - 03/14/13 02:10 AM
Wright brothers were not the first, History must be corrected.
|
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 10,845
JimK
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 10,845
Spokane,WA
|
Erebus Full Tower:Windows 7 Ult 64bit:Intel� Core� i7 3930K Processor(6x 3.20GHz)32GB[4 GB X8] DDR3-1866:GPU NVIDIA GeForce GTX Titan 6GB:1.5Kw PSU: 43" Sceptre 4k: LG Blu-ray burner,: hd1/750GB,hd2/2TB,hd3/1TB,hd4/1TB,HD5/4TB Youtube videosFlickr Photos
|
|
#3750603 - 03/14/13 03:26 AM
Re: Wright brothers were not the first, History must be corrected.
[Re: JimK]
|
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,527
WileECoyote
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,527
Argentina
|
My understanding was that it was well established that the weren't ?
The invention of the airplane, like any other thing, is full of people experimenting at the same time. Particularly in England and France there were a lot of guys experimenting with gliders and "planes", if you could call them that way. Some good, some bad, some could fly if they have gotten an engine (some tries were made with steam engines), some actually "flew" (technically speaking), some killed their pilots.
What the Wright brothers did, apart from being pioneers, is promote the thing very well. I think that's the key here.
When you're feeling sad, just remember that somewhere in the world, there's someone pushing a door that says "pull".
|
|
#3750608 - 03/14/13 03:41 AM
Re: Wright brothers were not the first, History must be corrected.
[Re: JimK]
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 9,710
Legend
Legsie is such a
|
Legsie is such a
Hotshot
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 9,710
Zutphen, NL / ShangHai, China
|
...and don't forget Germany, Otto Lilienthal had some good gliders.
IIRC there was a replica of the plane that Whitehead made, using the same type of engine and fuel Whitehead would've had access to. The replica flew, giving more credibility to the claim.
There is a theory which states that if ever anyone discovers exactly what the universe is for it will instantly disappear and be replaced by something even more inexplicable. There is another theory which states that this has already happened.
|
|
#3750632 - 03/14/13 05:05 AM
Re: Wright brothers were not the first, History must be corrected.
[Re: JimK]
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,450
vocatx
Member
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,450
Voca, Texas
|
There is a story here in Texas about a school teacher that supposedly flew an aircraft in the 1880s. There were supposed to be quite a few witnesses and an article was printed in the local paper at the time.
4H_V-man
System Specs: MSI 870 A-G54 AMD X4 Phenom II @ 3.4 ghz 8 Gb DDR3 1333 RAM 1 Tb Western Digital 250 Gb Western Digital 320 Gb Seagate Radeon HD 6970 graphics Thermaltake 650 Modualar power supply Thermaltake Element V full tower
|
|
#3750639 - 03/14/13 06:07 AM
Re: Wright brothers were not the first, History must be corrected.
[Re: JimK]
|
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 2,704
Billzilla
Senior Member
|
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 2,704
Brisbane, QLD, Australia
|
FWIW Richard Pearse from New Zealand flew about 400 metres in mid 1902 and about 900 metres (including a turn) in mid 1903.
Out of ammo Out of energy Out of ideas Down to harsh language
|
|
#3750653 - 03/14/13 08:28 AM
Re: Wright brothers were not the first, History must be corrected.
[Re: JimK]
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,763
Catfish
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,763
Where the ocean meets the sky
|
Mr. 'Whitehead' was an emigrated german, named Gustav Weisskopf (= became Whitehead later)
And even if he was the 'first one' to take off, it remains unclear whether his plane could be controlled as well as the Wright brothers' flyer, especially when it comes to turning, and rolling. http://www.n24.de/news/newsitem_8663120.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+n24%2Fhomepage+(N24+-+Top-News)
If it is about a short hop, there are also brazilian Santos-Dumont, german Karl Jatho and danish Ellehammer, having done that before the Wrights. But i always thought it was about really controlling a plane in a sustained (!) flight, and the Wrights sure were ahead of their time when it comes to that. Greetings, Catfish
Last edited by Catfish; 03/14/13 08:29 AM.
|
|
#3750692 - 03/14/13 11:30 AM
Re: Wright brothers were not the first, History must be corrected.
[Re: JimK]
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 152
Ibex
Member
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 152
Finland
|
Yes, there is nothing "radical" or "new" abut the fact that other people flew (more or less in control of their aircrafts) before 1903. The great question is at what point one should draw the line with regards to what "true powered flight" means, and what is simply "jumps" or "uncontrolled flight". Here's the wiki list if someones interested: ]Early flying machines
Last edited by Ibex; 03/14/13 11:31 AM.
|
|
#3750737 - 03/14/13 01:14 PM
Re: Wright brothers were not the first, History must be corrected.
[Re: JimK]
|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 8,932
ArgonV
Hotshot
|
Hotshot
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 8,932
College Station, Texas, USA
|
Straight "hops" are one thing. Being able to bank with control, gain height and come down again under control is something completely different. Do remember this however, the first Wright Flyer could not take off under it's own power (They used wind)... And most of the first flights of the Wright Flyer were also no more than "hops" with little, if any, turning involved.
"Go Fly A Kite!" -Jason R. FS-WWI Project Leader FS-WWI Plane Pack SiteIntel i9 10900k Gigabyte Z490 Aorus Elite AC 64GB Corsair DDR4 2933 Vengeance RGB Pro AMD XFX 7900 XTX Merc310 Black Edition LG UltraGear 38GN95B-B 38" monitor Corsair HX1200 PSU 1TB EVO 980 Pro M.2 PCIe x4 SSD 2TB EVO 980 Pro M.2 PCIe x4 SSD Two 2TB EVO 860 SSDs Sound Blaster ZxR Win 10 x64 Pro HOTAS Cougar #4069 w/Uber II Nxt mod #284 & UTM bushings
|
|
#3750786 - 03/14/13 02:14 PM
Re: Wright brothers were not the first, History must be corrected.
[Re: JimK]
|
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 49,716
Jedi Master
Entil'zha
|
Entil'zha
Sierra Hotel
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 49,716
Space Coast, USA
|
The reason the Wrights are famous is their flight actually created the public awareness worldwide that led to the aviation explosion. Sure others did it with some varying success before, but if they weren't believed or had limitations to their designs that made them impractical for further development, in the big picture they were just a footnote. After all, the Wright's design itself was a dead end eventually. The big names that came shortly after their flight were usually clean sheet designs, using ailerons and wings in front of the tail and all that. The Wrights made people believe that powered flight was a reality, not a fantasy or whimsy. THAT is their legacy.
The Jedi Master
The anteater is wearing the bagel because he's a reindeer princess. -- my 4 yr old daughter
|
|
#3750891 - 03/14/13 04:13 PM
Re: Wright brothers were not the first, History must be corrected.
[Re: JimK]
|
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,585
coasty
Senior Member
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,585
Asheville, NC, USA
|
Our family went to the centenial of the Wright Brother's flight in Kitty Hawk and like many have said here, it was their documentation and publicity that spread the fever for flight. Last year we visited their bicycle and printing shop in Dayton. the background they had in machinery served them well. The advances they made using wind tunnels, propeller design, and wing warping we all part of the success. I don't know how accurate the microsoft flight sim X is, but the Wright flier seem to be a tough machine to master.
Have you seen the Arrow? WWW
|
|
#3750927 - 03/14/13 05:12 PM
Re: Wright brothers were not the first, History must be corrected.
[Re: JimK]
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 7,335
Navigator
Hotshot
|
Hotshot
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 7,335
Mn U.S.A.
|
If Mr. Whiteheads plane got up to about 100 feet above the ground he would not need to turn as there wouldn't be much in the way.
The Wright plane can hold 2 people.
I'm still on the Wright Brothers side on this one.
Never rub another man's rhubarb.
|
|
#3751042 - 03/14/13 08:48 PM
Re: Wright brothers were not the first, History must be corrected.
[Re: ArgonV]
|
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 2,704
Billzilla
Senior Member
|
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 2,704
Brisbane, QLD, Australia
|
Straight "hops" are one thing. Being able to bank with control, gain height and come down again under control is something completely different. Do remember this however, the first Wright Flyer could not take off under it's own power (They used wind)... And most of the first flights of the Wright Flyer were also no more than "hops" with little, if any, turning involved. ... which is why I plug Pearse's flight on the 11th of May 1903 as being the first (or at least one of the first) proper flights. The aeroplane took off under its own power, then climbed over a river bank and so was out of ground effect (and flew over a local fellow's head while he was in a horse-drawn wagon) then made a turn and flew down a dry river for about 900 metres. It went like this -
Out of ammo Out of energy Out of ideas Down to harsh language
|
|
#3751062 - 03/14/13 09:43 PM
Re: Wright brothers were not the first, History must be corrected.
[Re: JimK]
|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 8,932
ArgonV
Hotshot
|
Hotshot
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 8,932
College Station, Texas, USA
|
"Go Fly A Kite!" -Jason R. FS-WWI Project Leader FS-WWI Plane Pack SiteIntel i9 10900k Gigabyte Z490 Aorus Elite AC 64GB Corsair DDR4 2933 Vengeance RGB Pro AMD XFX 7900 XTX Merc310 Black Edition LG UltraGear 38GN95B-B 38" monitor Corsair HX1200 PSU 1TB EVO 980 Pro M.2 PCIe x4 SSD 2TB EVO 980 Pro M.2 PCIe x4 SSD Two 2TB EVO 860 SSDs Sound Blaster ZxR Win 10 x64 Pro HOTAS Cougar #4069 w/Uber II Nxt mod #284 & UTM bushings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exodus
by RedOneAlpha. 04/18/24 05:46 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|