|
|
|
#3630005 - 08/20/12 06:17 PM
NASA starts planning for new Mars mission
|
Master of the Weird
Veteran
Registered: 01/06/01
Posts: 10390
Loc: Portugal
|
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-19327286Just two weeks after landing its Curiosity rover on Mars, the US space agency has announced it will send another robot to the planet in 2016. The InSight spacecraft will be a static lander that will carry instruments to investigate Mars' deep interior.
Scientists believe this will help them explain how all the planets formed 4.6 billion years ago - the Earth included. InSight beat two other proposals in a competition to find Nasa's next relatively low-cost mission. This so-called Discovery class of endeavour is cost-capped at $425m, although that figure does not include the rocket to launch the spacecraft.
InSight stands for Interior Exploration using Seismic Investigations, Geodesy and Heat Transport. It will be led from the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) in Pasadena, California. The design of the lander leans heavily on the successful Phoenix probe put on the Red Planet in 2008. But although the 2016 venture will look very similar, it will carry very different instrumentation. If we can't find them on the surface I guess it's time to try underground.
_________________________
©2010-oo All Your rights belong to Me
By reading this You acknowledge that Your body and soul, including all your worldly possessions, are now property of this poster. Any unauthorized use of them will be punished.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#3630870 - 08/22/12 08:42 AM
Re: NASA starts planning for new Mars mission
[Re: Desert Eagle]
|
Effervescent Libertarian
King Crimson - SimHQ's Top Poster
Registered: 04/04/01
Posts: 79432
Loc: Miami, FL USA
|
What's ironic to me is that NASA is doing more space exploration now than what it was doing with the shuttle.
_________________________
I speak Spanish to God, Italian to women, French to men, and German to my horse. - Charles V
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#3630882 - 08/22/12 09:15 AM
Re: NASA starts planning for new Mars mission
[Re: PanzerMeyer]
|
Member
Registered: 06/27/08
Posts: 537
Loc: Hungary
|
What's ironic to me is that NASA is doing more space exploration now than what it was doing with the shuttle. Well, we have to face, that a human being is just too complex to send to the mars. Its the same situation what we have with drones. If you leave out the human from the whole equation, you can leave out a lot of stuff, like instruments, air, space, ejection seat, suit, etc...
_________________________
Freedom of speech is our birth right, but the privilege of being heard needs to be gained.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#3630888 - 08/22/12 09:40 AM
Re: NASA starts planning for new Mars mission
[Re: Staniol]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 12/17/01
Posts: 3361
Loc: Portugal
|
Well, we have to face, that a human being is just too complex to send to the mars. Its the same situation what we have with drones. If you leave out the human from the whole equation, you can leave out a lot of stuff, like instruments, air, space, ejection seat, suit, etc... The "problem" is that nothing replaces the 'human being being there' - In the end this is just like looking at the pictures of the place that you which to travel the most to, while cool nothing beats the fact of actually being physically there! This is human nature. And I strongly believe that if Soviet Union didn't colapse that either the United States or the Soviet Union or both would already have put a man on Mars by now. (the competition factor)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#3631021 - 08/22/12 02:12 PM
Re: NASA starts planning for new Mars mission
[Re: ricnunes]
|
Member
Registered: 06/27/08
Posts: 537
Loc: Hungary
|
Well, we have to face, that a human being is just too complex to send to the mars. Its the same situation what we have with drones. If you leave out the human from the whole equation, you can leave out a lot of stuff, like instruments, air, space, ejection seat, suit, etc... The "problem" is that nothing replaces the 'human being being there' - In the end this is just like looking at the pictures of the place that you which to travel the most to, while cool nothing beats the fact of actually being physically there! This is human nature. And I strongly believe that if Soviet Union didn't colapse that either the United States or the Soviet Union or both would already have put a man on Mars by now. (the competition factor) I had high hopes when I was a kid, dreaming about a spacestation, space travel etc. It is there now, but I soon realised, I will only see a picture of it during my life, will never be there.
_________________________
Freedom of speech is our birth right, but the privilege of being heard needs to be gained.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#3631045 - 08/22/12 02:57 PM
Re: NASA starts planning for new Mars mission
[Re: PanzerMeyer]
|
Frugalite & P-38 fan
Senior Member
Registered: 05/29/10
Posts: 3525
Loc: The Netherlands
|
What's ironic to me is that NASA is doing more space exploration now than what it was doing with the shuttle. Was it that they were focused on the business side then, trying to generate some money by sending satellites into orbit? Now freed from that task, they have time and other resources available for exploration?
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#3631049 - 08/22/12 03:07 PM
Re: NASA starts planning for new Mars mission
[Re: JAMF]
|
Effervescent Libertarian
King Crimson - SimHQ's Top Poster
Registered: 04/04/01
Posts: 79432
Loc: Miami, FL USA
|
Was it that they were focused on the business side then, trying to generate some money by sending satellites into orbit? Now freed from that task, they have time and other resources available for exploration?
That could be a possibility but I always thought that the original plan for the space shuttles was "space exploration" and not just using it as a cargo vessel.
_________________________
I speak Spanish to God, Italian to women, French to men, and German to my horse. - Charles V
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#3631053 - 08/22/12 03:11 PM
Re: NASA starts planning for new Mars mission
[Re: JAMF]
|
One Man Wolfpack
Senior Member
Registered: 01/04/09
Posts: 4065
Loc: Raleigh, NC
|
What's ironic to me is that NASA is doing more space exploration now than what it was doing with the shuttle. Was it that they were focused on the business side then, trying to generate some money by sending satellites into orbit? Now freed from that task, they have time and other resources available for exploration? The space shuttle was never meant to be an exploratory vehicle; it was specifically designed as a reusable launch vehicle for toting payloads to low to mid Earth orbit, or returning them. More of a pickup truck than a scout vehicle. However, NASA's long-term vision during the time the shuttle was being designed was for a permanent orbital presence in the form of a manned laboratory and construction facility for building pure space ships to travel from Earth orbit to the moon, Mars, etc. Obviously, that last part never happened. But that was the program's original intent, from everything I remember reading.
_________________________
" And any man who may be asked in this century what he did to make his life worthwhile, I think can respond with a good deal of pride and satisfaction: 'I served in the United States Navy.'"- John F. Kennedy
"NUKE-ular. It's pronounced NUKE-ular."- Homer Simpson
AMD FX-8350 Vishera @ 4.0 Ghz ASUS Sabertooth 990FX R2.0 2x 8GB Corsair Vengeance DDR3 @ 1600 Sapphire Radeon HD 7850 2GB CM Storm Series Trooper Samsung 840 series 500 GB OS/ Game drive WD Green 2TB Media Drive Thermaltake Black Widow 850W PSU
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |