#3625024 - 08/12/12 07:18 PM
Re: SAM Simulator
[Re: farokh]
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,010
piston79
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,010
|
|
|
#3625077 - 08/12/12 09:22 PM
Re: SAM Simulator
[Re: piston79]
|
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 916
farokh
farokh
|
farokh
Member
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 916
I-RAN
|
uhhhh... i think my all of bone behind pc is break ok. piston .... i do it! only with nuclear warhead 9:20am 15th of April, 1986. SR-71 bomb damage assessment flight.
S-75M3 Volkhov
00:01:35, V-760 15D Missile launched on Channel-1 Target distance: 91km Target azimuth: 69° Target elevation: 13° Target altitude: 21.3km SNR mode: Wide Beam - 75km Missile guidance method: T/T (Three Point)
00:01:42, V-760 15D Missile launched on Channel-2 Target distance: 86km Target azimuth: 67° Target elevation: 14° Target altitude: 21.3km SNR mode: Wide Beam - 75km Missile guidance method: T/T (Three Point)
00:01:47, V-760 15D Missile launched on Channel-3 Target distance: 82km Target azimuth: 66° Target elevation: 15° Target altitude: 21.3km SNR mode: Wide Beam - 75km Missile guidance method: T/T (Three Point)
00:02:39, Missile exploded on Channel-1 SR-71 Tromp-30 hit by nuclear blast. (distance from epicenter: 3541m)
00:02:45, Missile exploded on Channel-2 SR-71 Tromp-30 hit by nuclear blast. (distance from epicenter: 3341m)
Total, SNR On Air Time: 4min 1sec
Last edited by milang; 08/12/12 09:40 PM.
|
|
#3625349 - 08/13/12 06:28 AM
Re: SAM Simulator
[Re: max2012]
|
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 916
farokh
farokh
|
farokh
Member
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 916
I-RAN
|
Hello Milang!
This max2012!
Is that you missed was far from undermining the very admitted my mistake, I'm just like you can not knock down any way.
00:02:39, Missile exploded on Channel-a SR-71 Tromp-30 hit by nuclear blast. (distance from epicenter: 3541m)
00:02:45, Missile exploded on Channel-2 SR-71 Tromp-30 hit by nuclear blast. (distance from epicenter: 3341m)
Far away to be in the range of 2000 m
Miss you!
Shoot the mean time when the line of the meeting was not included in the kill zone window, shoot a bit ahead.
Otherwise, if later, the rocket is going to catch up and all of it away from them.
hi max2012.... nice to meet u .... i know my shoot was not enough but that was my first time to hit this aircraft on libya of course in next time i do my best for break my record so could u explain why nuclear sa-2E missile have to explode on 2000M? so if my launch was far far from target why s-71 going down? That's where I got the SR-71 that a nice shot If you want to show the video as I was hit, that you have tried as well.
I, too, it was difficult to shoot it down!
excuse me i dont understand what is your mean...! u mean is i have to creat video from this hunt dude?
|
|
#3626133 - 08/14/12 02:10 PM
Re: SAM Simulator
[Re: Hpasp]
|
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 635
Alien_MasterMynd
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 635
Czech Republic
|
I have tested S-200VE against SR-71 in Tallinn scenario. I launched six missiles, the first which achieved a lock after start was fired at distance of almost 200km and with RSSI of 19,7dB. 1967. SR-71 Operation Tallin.
S-200VE Vega-E
00:09:47, Missile launched from launcher-1 Target distance: 237km Target azimuth: 48° Target elevation: 4° Target angular speed: 908m/s (3,2 Mach) Target altitude: 24km RPC mode: MHI - Narrow Beam GSN mode: Acquire target during flight Received signal strength: 14,2dB
00:10:03, Missile launched from launcher-2 Target distance: 223km Target azimuth: 49° Target elevation: 5° Target angular speed: 906m/s (3,2 Mach) Target altitude: 24km RPC mode: MHI - Narrow Beam GSN mode: Acquire target during flight Received signal strength: 16,1dB
00:10:24, Missile launched from launcher-3 Target distance: 204km Target azimuth: 50° Target elevation: 5° Target angular speed: 903m/s (3,2 Mach) Target altitude: 24km RPC mode: MHI - Narrow Beam GSN mode: Acquire target during flight Received signal strength: 18,5dB
00:10:34, Missile launched from launcher-4 Target distance: 195km Target azimuth: 50° Target elevation: 6° Target angular speed: 901m/s (3,2 Mach) Target altitude: 24km RPC mode: MHI - Narrow Beam GSN mode: Acquire target during flight Received signal strength: 19,7dB
00:10:49, Missile launched from launcher-5 Target distance: 182km Target azimuth: 51° Target elevation: 6° Target angular speed: 898m/s (3,2 Mach) Target altitude: 24km RPC mode: MHI - Narrow Beam GSN mode: Acquire target during flight Received signal strength: 21,4dB
00:10:54, Missile launched from launcher-6 Target distance: 177km Target azimuth: 51° Target elevation: 7° Target angular speed: 897m/s (3,2 Mach) Target altitude: 24km RPC mode: MHI - Narrow Beam GSN mode: Acquire target during flight Received signal strength: 22,1dB
00:12:03, Missile exploded SR-71 Habu killed by SAM. (miss distance: 5m)
00:12:13, Missile exploded SR-71 Habu killed by SAM. (miss distance: 8m)
00:12:17, Missile exploded SR-71 Habu killed by SAM. (miss distance: 9m)
Total, SNR On Air Time: 11min 9sec
|
|
#3626201 - 08/14/12 03:52 PM
Re: SAM Simulator
[Re: Alien_MasterMynd]
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,010
piston79
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,010
|
I have tested S-200VE against SR-71 in Tallinn scenario. I launched six missiles, the first which achieved a lock after start was fired at distance of almost 200km and with RSSI of 19,7dB.
What is your point? That now missiles achieved lock-on, based on distance to the target?
|
|
#3626300 - 08/14/12 06:00 PM
SR-71 vs. Vega
|
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 916
farokh
farokh
|
farokh
Member
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 916
I-RAN
|
I have tested S-200VE against SR-71 in Tallinn scenario. I launched six missiles, the first which achieved a lock after start was fired at distance of almost 200km and with RSSI of 19,7dB. 1967. SR-71 Operation Tallin.
S-200VE Vega-E
00:09:47, Missile launched from launcher-1 Target distance: 237km Target azimuth: 48° Target elevation: 4° Target angular speed: 908m/s (3,2 Mach) Target altitude: 24km RPC mode: MHI - Narrow Beam GSN mode: Acquire target during flight Received signal strength: 14,2dB
00:10:03, Missile launched from launcher-2 Target distance: 223km Target azimuth: 49° Target elevation: 5° Target angular speed: 906m/s (3,2 Mach) Target altitude: 24km RPC mode: MHI - Narrow Beam GSN mode: Acquire target during flight Received signal strength: 16,1dB
00:10:24, Missile launched from launcher-3 Target distance: 204km Target azimuth: 50° Target elevation: 5° Target angular speed: 903m/s (3,2 Mach) Target altitude: 24km RPC mode: MHI - Narrow Beam GSN mode: Acquire target during flight Received signal strength: 18,5dB
00:10:34, Missile launched from launcher-4 Target distance: 195km Target azimuth: 50° Target elevation: 6° Target angular speed: 901m/s (3,2 Mach) Target altitude: 24km RPC mode: MHI - Narrow Beam GSN mode: Acquire target during flight Received signal strength: 19,7dB
00:10:49, Missile launched from launcher-5 Target distance: 182km Target azimuth: 51° Target elevation: 6° Target angular speed: 898m/s (3,2 Mach) Target altitude: 24km RPC mode: MHI - Narrow Beam GSN mode: Acquire target during flight Received signal strength: 21,4dB
00:10:54, Missile launched from launcher-6 Target distance: 177km Target azimuth: 51° Target elevation: 7° Target angular speed: 897m/s (3,2 Mach) Target altitude: 24km RPC mode: MHI - Narrow Beam GSN mode: Acquire target during flight Received signal strength: 22,1dB
00:12:03, Missile exploded SR-71 Habu killed by SAM. (miss distance: 5m)
00:12:13, Missile exploded SR-71 Habu killed by SAM. (miss distance: 8m)
00:12:17, Missile exploded SR-71 Habu killed by SAM. (miss distance: 9m)
Total, SNR On Air Time: 11min 9sec alien please dont tell me u wanna create Comparison between sa-5 with sa-2E for hunt sr-71 evry person know what different between s-200 and v-750 20DSU ! this is realy not logical Comparison if u want begin Comparison between algolithm and parameters of sa-2E and sa-5b
|
|
#3626674 - 08/15/12 06:07 AM
Re: SAM Simulator
[Re: piston79]
|
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 635
Alien_MasterMynd
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 635
Czech Republic
|
What is your point? That now missiles achieved lock-on, based on distance to the target? I just tried what is the minimum RSSI (or maximum firing distance) for missiles to achieve lock (officially there should be about 25dB).
|
|
#3626719 - 08/15/12 08:58 AM
Re: SAM Simulator
[Re: Alien_MasterMynd]
|
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 916
farokh
farokh
|
farokh
Member
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 916
I-RAN
|
What is your point? That now missiles achieved lock-on, based on distance to the target? I just tried what is the minimum RSSI (or maximum firing distance) for missiles to achieve lock (officially there should be about 25dB). ok... back to the orginal subject! alien..loook! there is big different between tracking sa-2E and sa-5b! i can show u i can shot down sr-71 wit sa-2E near kill zone on 50km! but one thing! that sr-71 shoted down by u.. he still at good situation about altitude! one and good reason for kiling s-71 with 17 or 18 db just have a one reason! just sr-71 fly on good altitude for sa-5B also sr-71 have big body for easy tracking ...is'nt?
Last edited by milang; 08/15/12 08:59 AM.
|
|
#3626734 - 08/15/12 09:47 AM
Re: SAM Simulator
[Re: farokh]
|
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 635
Alien_MasterMynd
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 635
Czech Republic
|
Reagrding SR-71 I tested (practical) minimum of RSSI, nothing else :-) And the reason you can shoot way below 25dB is the SR-71's huge speed on incoming course The problem why we are not yet able to shoot SR-71 down in Libya is the fact it is turning form almost east to almost north at the edge of S-75's destruction zone and missiles simply can not catch it.
|
|
#3626735 - 08/15/12 09:53 AM
Re: SAM Simulator
[Re: Alien_MasterMynd]
|
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 916
farokh
farokh
|
farokh
Member
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 916
I-RAN
|
The problem why we are not yet able to shoot SR-71 down in Libya is the fact it is turning form almost east to almost north at the edge of S-75's destruction zone and missiles simply can not catch it.
corect... only reason for runing s-71 is just he flying very near to out of kill zone! v-755 20dsu speed, after pass 45 km going down slowly but sr-71 still on air with 3 mach but i think if hpasp added v-759 5ya23 missile on that scenario ... we have more chance to get him down
Last edited by milang; 08/15/12 09:58 AM.
|
|
#3626745 - 08/15/12 10:40 AM
Re: SAM Simulator
[Re: piston79]
|
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 916
farokh
farokh
|
farokh
Member
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 916
I-RAN
|
but i think if hpasp added v-759 5ya23 missile on that scenario ... we have more chance to get him down Not sure... 5ya23 has a shorter range and is slower than DSU. what? please check again sa2E pdf exactly page 35 and 37 ! i tested this 2 missile on ashuluk on b-1 practice target ! i get better result with 5Ya23 than 20DSU ofcourse it's Just depending on personal preference.
Last edited by milang; 08/15/12 10:43 AM.
|
|
#3627043 - 08/15/12 06:15 PM
Re: SAM Simulator
[Re: farokh]
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,010
piston79
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,010
|
what? please check again sa2E pdf exactly page 35 and 37 ! Wrong... But G's table is OK, you can compare: V-755 (DSU) -2.7-3 G at 25 km V-759 (5Ya23) -3-3.3 G at 25 km i tested this 2 missile on ashuluk on b-1 practice target ! i get better result with 5Ya23 than 20DSU Not surprised... (See above)
|
|
#3628787 - 08/18/12 08:46 PM
Re: SAM Simulator
[Re: farokh]
|
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 916
farokh
farokh
|
farokh
Member
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 916
I-RAN
|
i guess that 2 type of sa-2E missile not much different toghether just v-759 has a better manuever than DSU! just it
Last edited by milang; 08/19/12 09:59 AM.
|
|
|
|