#3597091 - 06/25/12 05:33 PM
Re: SAM Simulator
[Re: Hpasp]
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,011
piston79
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,011
|
About my beloved "Volkhov": I am sure that "Rab ot VM" works even after missile is launched: Shortly, if we do not know the height when using TT I-87B, K3 and K4 depended by switching of the "Rab ot VM" switch. If we switch it BEFORE launch or before 18-th second after the launch (11-12 km of the missile flight), K4 goes to missile on the 18-th second, and K3 on the 22.6 second of missile flight. If we switch "Rab ot VM" after 18-th second of the missile flight - no K4, and K3 is transmiting on the 22.6 second, or in the moment of switching! If K4 was transmited (switching "Rab ot VM" before 18-th second)- it tunes radiofuse for missile-target relativ speed 750 <V rel < 1750 m/s. If K4 wasn't transmit at all (switching "Rab ot VM" AFTER 18-th second) - the radiofuse antenas are tuned for relative speed above 1550 m/s. So if we do not know target speed or it's a high speed target, we should switch "Rab ot VM" after more than 18 seconds after launch. Also for the VOZVRAT option:From Hpasp: In STAND (normal) radio proxy fuse mode, 300m before the range boresight, K3 command is sent out, to arm the Radio-Proxy fuse. If the missile avoid the target, and fly further the range boresight, the K3 command is emitted again by the SNR. When the K3 received second time, the missile will do, what the SL-I/II switch signaled on the launcher. If you press the VOZVRAT before the missile reached the range boresight, the K3 is signalled twice
If VOZVRAT is presse before 23-d second after launch, but before pass the range boresight the missile selfdestruct right after 23-d second from launch. if VOZVRAT is pressed after 23-d second from the launch, but before cross the range boresight, it destructed almmost imediately.
|
|
#3597986 - 06/27/12 07:00 AM
Re: SAM Simulator
[Re: farokh]
|
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,665
Hpasp
Senior Member
|
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,665
Hungary, Europe
|
why sa-6 missile armed with 4 air inlet ???? sustiner sa-6 missile is ramjet????? Yes, sustainer is solid ramjet. (from here:) http://www.ausairpower.net/APA-2K12-Kvadrat.html 1 1SB4M CW monopulse semi-active homing seeker with Doppler closure rate capability 2 3E27 CW radio two channel proximity fuse (30 m nominal radius) 3 3N12 57 kg blast-fragmention warhead 4 1SB6M Autopilot 5 Ramjet intake ducts 6 9D16K sustainer solid gas generator charge (67 kg LK-6TM reducing propellant) 7 Frangible seals 8 Boost stage solid propellant charge (172 kg VIK-2 propellant) 9 Exhaust nozzle 10 Cruciform tailfins 11 Cruciform wing
Last edited by Hpasp; 06/27/12 07:02 AM.
|
|
#3598239 - 06/27/12 05:20 PM
Re: SAM Simulator
[Re: Hpasp]
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,893
GrayGhost
Hotshot
|
Hotshot
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,893
|
This isn't the first time that a SAM has out-performed its stated capability. This happened in the falklands as well. There is more to a SAM engagement zone than just rocket capability.
-- 44th VFW
|
|
#3598246 - 06/27/12 05:32 PM
Re: SAM Simulator
[Re: GrayGhost]
|
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,665
Hpasp
Senior Member
|
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,665
Hungary, Europe
|
This isn't the first time that a SAM has out-performed its stated capability. This happened in the falklands as well. There is more to a SAM engagement zone than just rocket capability. Actually the borders of the SAM (guaranteed) destruction zones in the Soviet systems are not like hard walls. They just state, that inside this zone, the missile will kill its (non jamming, non maneuvering) target with 97% chance. Outside of these zones, the chance of hit will be dramatically reduced. Even the official firing manual states some case, where missile should be launched while the expected destruction point is outside of the guaranteed destruction zone.
|
|
#3598337 - 06/27/12 07:44 PM
Re: SAM Simulator
[Re: Hpasp]
|
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,665
Hpasp
Senior Member
|
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,665
Hungary, Europe
|
Just some additional info, to help the brainstorming here... Contrary to the RPC 1.4 or 0.7 degree beam, its IFF system has a whooping 10 degree "pencil" beam!!! If the target is inside of it, giving "I'm your target" signal, the crew could accidentally lock on target, 60km away from the actual IFF signal sender. This is why own fighters should stay far away of any S-200 engagement. (See piston table above.) WARPACT procedures called several IFF checks during an engagement. 1st check after target acquisition. 2nd check just before missile launch. 3rd check during missile flight. My guess is the crew did several IFF checks on the passenger plane, just the drone was inside of the 10 degree area...
Last edited by Hpasp; 06/27/12 07:52 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
Exodus
by RedOneAlpha. 04/18/24 05:46 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|