Forums Articles Events Community Daily News
Forums » Air Combat & Civil Aviation » SAM Simulator Active Topics You are not logged in. [Log In] [Register User]
Page 299 of 351 < 1 2 ... 297 298 299 300 301 ... 350 351 >
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
Hop to:
#3589516 - 06/10/12 03:01 PM Re: SAM Simulator [Re: Hpasp]
GrayGhost Offline
Senior Member

Registered: 12/17/03
Posts: 4311
Right, I'm pretty sure that according to the western designation, none of those are less than MERAD smile
_________________________
--
44th VFW

Top
#3589533 - 06/10/12 03:58 PM Re: SAM Simulator [Re: Hpasp]
piston79 Offline
Member

Registered: 09/02/11
Posts: 865
Hi, Hpasp..

I have a question about The Hungary practice.... Is it possible to add 3D AAR for the training mode missiles?
I think it could be nice addition, because it is like an mission editor and therefore we could do some tricky stuff there. yep
How about that?


Edited by piston79 (06/10/12 04:00 PM)
Top
#3589589 - 06/10/12 06:12 PM Re: SAM Simulator [Re: Hpasp]
jazjar Online zombie
Member

Registered: 06/24/11
Posts: 201
Loc: you would look here!
Hpasp, what ever happened to the simulation of the ZSU-23-4 Shilka? Was your access to documentation denied?

Top
#3589680 - 06/10/12 10:21 PM Re: SAM Simulator [Re: Hpasp]
jazjar Online zombie
Member

Registered: 06/24/11
Posts: 201
Loc: you would look here!
Also, Vintorez, thanks a lot for your manual on the SA-2. Just to be clear on the tracking modes in real life, RS is manual tracking by the FCO, AS is manual tracking by the manual trackers, and AS-AP is autotracking, all modes can track with or without a real target on the scope to track, for instance, if I shut down my radar in AS-AP after initiating a lock, then the system would continue to track based off of the computer?

Top
#3589703 - 06/10/12 11:43 PM Re: SAM Simulator [Re: jazjar]
JWNoctis Offline
Junior Member

Registered: 05/04/11
Posts: 40
Originally Posted By: jazjar
Hpasp, what ever happened to the simulation of the ZSU-23-4 Shilka? Was your access to documentation denied?


ZSU-23-4 is something that does not require extensive infrastructure support, in contrast of what we have now -- Given the amount of soviet equipments available around some hot spots, it would not be impossible for a band of terrorists to get their hand on one, hide it near the runway threshold of some airport, and do something high-profile...Or at least we'd get pounced all over by media, lawyers and intelligence agencies before this, should there be a ZSU-23-4 sim accurate to the switch.

So, as Hpasp said, SAM Simulator will not be a terrorist trainer.


Edited by JWNoctis (06/10/12 11:45 PM)
Top
#3589742 - 06/11/12 03:32 AM Re: SAM Simulator [Re: JWNoctis]
amalahama Offline
Junior Member

Registered: 03/31/07
Posts: 27
Really? Is that the real reason? C'mon, SAMsim is a procedure trainer, nobody can expect to control a ZSU only with that.

It would be a interesting addition, rather than Nike-Hercules.

Regards!

Top
#3589754 - 06/11/12 04:12 AM Re: SAM Simulator [Re: amalahama]
farokh Offline
farokh
Member

Registered: 04/22/12
Posts: 603
Loc: IRAN
i agree with u

Originally Posted By: amalahama
Really? Is that the real reason? C'mon, SAMsim is a procedure trainer, nobody can expect to control a ZSU only with that.

It would be a interesting addition, rather than Nike-Hercules.

Regards!


Edited by milang (06/11/12 04:12 AM)
Top
#3589756 - 06/11/12 04:26 AM Re: SAM Simulator [Re: Hpasp]
Alien_MasterMynd Offline
Member

Registered: 04/27/12
Posts: 235
Loc: Czech Republic
I have now tried to acquire F-14 in Prairie Fire as close to SAM as possible. I was in a distance acquiring process in 55kHz mode when the formation of two F-14 turned away. Target mark at first began to switch up and down when very close targets in formation turned and finally they flew away on the screen to the left lower part.

Simulation looks good, Hpasp did a good work :-)

Top
#3589757 - 06/11/12 04:27 AM Re: SAM Simulator [Re: Hpasp]
farokh Offline
farokh
Member

Registered: 04/22/12
Posts: 603
Loc: IRAN
aaaaah ! one old post rise up again reading

guys no terrorrist team used shilka ! because using ilga and stinger is very very easeiest than shilka !

that terrorrist must bee idiot ! if they want use shilka for hit aircraft hahaha
that who person said terrorist used shilka for hit civil aircraft !!! please note it in the one post !
if this realy happend done !

Top
#3589759 - 06/11/12 04:37 AM Re: SAM Simulator [Re: Hpasp]
Alien_MasterMynd Offline
Member

Registered: 04/27/12
Posts: 235
Loc: Czech Republic
Nuked 'em :-) in Prairie Fire....

Click to reveal..
13:46 24th of March, 1986.
Operation Prairie Fire

S-200VE Vega-E


00:04:36, Missile launched from launcher-1
Target distance: 85km
Target azimuth: 12°
Target elevation: 2°
Target angular speed: 275m/s (0,9 Mach)
Target altitude: 4,5km
RPC mode: MHI - Narrow Beam
GSN mode: Acquire target before launch
Received signal strength: 39dB


00:04:43, Missile launched from launcher-2
Target distance: 84km
Target azimuth: 12°
Target elevation: 2°
Target angular speed: 277m/s (0,9 Mach)
Target altitude: 4,5km
RPC mode: MHI - Narrow Beam
GSN mode: Acquire target before launch
Received signal strength: 39,2dB


00:04:55, Missile launched from launcher-3
Target distance: 80km
Target azimuth: 12°
Target elevation: 2°
Target angular speed: 221m/s (0,7 Mach)
Target altitude: 3,8km
RPC mode: MHI - Narrow Beam
GSN mode: Acquire target before launch
Received signal strength: 39,5dB


00:05:44, Missile exploded
F-14B Tomcat killed by nuclear blast. (distance from epicenter: 429m)
F-14B Tomcat killed by nuclear blast. (distance from epicenter: 2m)

Total, SNR On Air Time: 2min 8sec


3DAAR

Top
Page 299 of 351 < 1 2 ... 297 298 299 300 301 ... 350 351 >
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
Hop to:

Moderator:  Cat, Hpasp, RacerGT 
 

Forum Use Agreement | Privacy Statement
Copyright 1997-2013, SimHQ Inc. All Rights Reserved.