Forums » Air Combat & Civil Aviation » DCS World » DCS: A-10C Warthog » DCS future developments Active Topics You are not logged in. [Log In] [Register User]
Page 3 of 15 < 1 2 3 4 5 ... 14 15 >
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
Hop to:
#3562990 - 04/26/12 09:28 AM Re: DCS future developments [Re: tagTaken2]
GrayGhost Offline
Senior Member

Registered: 12/17/03
Posts: 4317
There were screens of other cockpits as well. Not that this matters anyway.

Originally Posted By: tagTaken2
Kind of narrows it down to F-15, 16, 18, hard to believe they still won't announce which one it's going to be, if not which version.
Probably too far-fetched, but there are screens of F-16 cockpit around, wonder if they were doing but cancelled after BMS came out?
_________________________
--
44th VFW


Top
#3563006 - 04/26/12 10:00 AM Re: DCS future developments [Re: GrayGhost]
eno75 Online   eating
Bullet / Missile Sponge
Member

Registered: 01/30/12
Posts: 1432
Loc: Alberta / BC, Canada
I think the f-16 is well cooked. I'd preorder an apache, f-15c/e or maybe a... Ummmmm... Even an f-18e/f would add some excitement to naval ops. And maybe a different theater of operations would be nice. this combined arms angle is exciting...
_________________________
ENO
"Go Ugly Early."
SimHQ Firehouse Server Thread
LOF Firehouse Server Thread

Top

#3563062 - 04/26/12 12:18 PM Re: DCS future developments [Re: BillyRiley]
Lion Offline
Member

Registered: 10/22/10
Posts: 469
Loc: Canada
They have screens of cockpits laying around because if you look the cockpits of AI aircraft in the current games, they're pretty highly detailed.
_________________________
www.vfa-41.net - Active Jane's F/A-18E Super Hornet multiplayer squadron.

Top
#3563096 - 04/26/12 01:24 PM Re: DCS future developments [Re: BillyRiley]
rud24 Offline
Member

Registered: 07/07/09
Posts: 137
I love speculating as much as the next person but I don't have a whole lot of concern whatever comes out.

Honestly, how many were even aware of the Ka-50 before DCS decided to do it? I think It's not about them making sims for the platforms we love, it's about them making us love the platforms they make sims for.

Top
#3563287 - 04/26/12 09:00 PM Re: DCS future developments [Re: rud24]
eno75 Online   eating
Bullet / Missile Sponge
Member

Registered: 01/30/12
Posts: 1432
Loc: Alberta / BC, Canada
Originally Posted By: rud24
I think It's not about them making sims for the platforms we love, it's about them making us love the platforms they make sims for.


VERY well put.
_________________________
ENO
"Go Ugly Early."
SimHQ Firehouse Server Thread
LOF Firehouse Server Thread

Top
#3563392 - 04/27/12 05:38 AM Re: DCS future developments [Re: rud24]
tagTaken2 Offline
Member

Registered: 05/06/06
Posts: 1000
Loc: Gone.
Originally Posted By: rud24
I think It's not about them making sims for the platforms we love, it's about them making us love the platforms they make sims for.


True, same applies to the Eastern front and Il-2. If the product is good enough...

Top
#3563403 - 04/27/12 06:17 AM Re: DCS future developments [Re: BillyRiley]
BillyRiley Offline
Member

Registered: 01/28/04
Posts: 1509
Loc: Colchester, England
I agree with rud24 - and in truth, whilst I have my favourites that I'd like, I'd be quite stoked about a relative unknown. I just can't get excited about props.

So whatever they are working on in the jet/helicopter department, I'd be stoked about. Just wish I knew smile

Top
#3563641 - 04/27/12 04:10 PM Re: DCS future developments [Re: BillyRiley]
Hamblue Offline
Member

Registered: 04/03/12
Posts: 128
It seems the planes they do are the one's available for inspection. Anything else that is classified would probably be off of the list.
_________________________
Motherboard: P67 Sabertooth. CPU: 2600K clocked to 4Ghz.
Ram: 16Gig Power Supply: 1000 watt Video:GTX 680
Hard Drives: 256 Gig Samsung 830 and 1TB maxtor.
Video Card. Evga GTX 680
Controllers: Warthog Hotas, Saitek Combat pedals, Razer Mamba Mouse, Nostromo N52 pad, Track IR5. Headsets. CreaCorsair surround.

Top
#3563654 - 04/27/12 04:51 PM Re: DCS future developments [Re: BillyRiley]
msalama Offline
Member

Registered: 07/27/05
Posts: 512
Quote:
It seems the planes they do are the one's available for inspection.


To my understanding this indeed is the main criteria when they choose what to model, i.e. all pertinent data has to be available for the plane in question in order to reproduce it accurately.

Top
#3563728 - 04/27/12 08:49 PM Re: DCS future developments [Re: BillyRiley]
Frederf Offline
Member

Registered: 10/26/09
Posts: 596
I couldn't imagine an aircraft that has seen military service that I would not find entertaining. KC-10? UH-60? P-80? F-5E? C-130? Each one has something new to offer in terms of experiencing aviation in a way that one hasn't before. There are ones better than others, namely ones with lots of functions and ones with a prevalent role on the FC/DCS combined battlefield.

P-51 sounds cool if for no other reason than I haven't seen a plane of this type in enough depth. IL-2 just doesn't cut it.

And I'm making a mental bookmark about the combined ops thing. If it's exactly as I think it will be I claim the right for an "I told you so." If it's not then you can laugh at me.

Top
Page 3 of 15 < 1 2 3 4 5 ... 14 15 >
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
Hop to:

Moderator:  EinsteinEP, Panther, RacerGT 
 

Forum Use Agreement | Privacy Statement
Copyright 1997-2013, SimHQ Inc. All Rights Reserved.