Navy Nuke, it would be just my luck to go to Brazil or Columbia and get myself kidnapped. I'll be on the evening news!
One thing these show clearly is that MS Flight can't touch FSX. And never will. Just look at my pics!
IMHO, I think the clouds in your shots do look better than Flight. Otherwise, I think MS Flight looks better in all other regards, hands down.
Can that be debated? Of course. But I think "these clearly show that MS Flight can't touch FSX" is quite an overstatement.
I totally disagree. The clouds are stock FSX. I didn't even use REX 2.0 I too have Flight, and I have to disagree with your opinion. Flight can't touch FSX. Where are the ships? Where is the road traffic? Where are the A.I. planes?
Well, it is true that Flight doesn't have any of those. But your statement was that your pics demonstrated FSX superiority. Yet, with the exception of one shot that has some cars on a bridge, none of your screen shots show road traffic, ships, or AI planes. So while you have a valid point about those features not being present in Flight, you pics did not suggest or support that claim.
So perhaps you understand my confusion.
Edited by malibu43 (04/24/12 11:37 PM)
HP Pavillion Dv6t Quad Edition, Win7 (64), i7 2.0ghz, 1GB Radeon HD6770M, 6GB RAM, 640GB HD, TrackIR 4, Saitek AV8R
Rise of Flight
IL-2 DBW 3.0
DCS / Flaming Cliffs 3