|
|
#3578133 - 05/23/12 12:20 PM
Re: SAM Simulator
[Re: farokh]
|
Member
Registered: 12/31/09
Posts: 1711
Loc: Hungary, Europe
|
to MR.HPaSPplease creat display option for nexr version.. for using easily!!! i have lap top ..but i cant work with this simulator because resulution maximum is 1280*800 if u creat a setting for display we can use from sam sim on ouwn lap top! so sam simulator is always with me at evry where please mr.hp....  do somthing  Please check the FAQ part of the SAMSIM website. https://sites.google.com/site/samsimulator1972/home
F.A.Q.
Technical problems
What is needed, to be able to start the simulator?
Computer must be able to display resolution 1280x1024, or above. Easiest thing to do is to buy a cheap LCD monitor.
Edited by Hpasp (05/23/12 12:20 PM)
_________________________
Hpasp
Free SAM Simulator, "Realistic to the Switch"
http://sites.google.com/site/samsimulator1972/home
While Fighter Pilots made movies, SAM Officers made History.
(U-2 over Sverdlovsk, B-52's over Hanoi, F-4 Phantoms over the Sinai, F-16's and the F-117A Stealth bomber over the Balkans.)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#3578236 - 05/23/12 02:29 PM
Re: SAM Simulator
[Re: Hpasp]
|
farokh
Member
Registered: 04/22/12
Posts: 612
Loc: IRAN
|
no no mr.hpasp.. i guess your thinked about me is wrong.. this is not my mean i have a best personal computer with 21.5 LCD wide and i can run this program with resolution 1980 and 1280*1024  my mean is creat graphical setting for lap top only... until evry sam user gone to example : travel !! he can work with sam simulator on lap top! this is my mean sir.. im not pooor guy sir br milang
Edited by milang (05/23/12 02:32 PM)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#3578632 - 05/24/12 01:46 AM
Re: SAM Simulator
[Re: farokh]
|
Member
Registered: 12/27/11
Posts: 423
|
The answer to your question!
SAM simulator is not designed to run on a Laptop!
Permits are not equal to the Laptop The minimum 1280x1024
Permission for Laptop 1366x768 as usual I did not fit, simulator runs, but will edge Screen!
In the 1600x900 Resolution also will not be.
I tried to go, but the edge!
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#3578648 - 05/24/12 02:36 AM
Re: SAM Simulator
[Re: Lonewolf357]
|
Member
Registered: 12/31/09
Posts: 1711
Loc: Hungary, Europe
|
In theory, the '80s multichannel - phased array based SAM systems are less vulnerable.
From what I've heard, 30N6 firing radar of S-300 has very noticeable backlobes (signal from emitter's lens is reflected from rear ends of phase shifters, which are large compared to their aperture for radar signal, and antenna frame), so I bet HARM would be able to home on it from behind. The same applies to S-300V. I guess, that is the reason why newer radars, such as that of Korean KM-SAM, have solid shroud around the radar's rear. This is simply a general disadvantage of the space feeded, phase shifter antenna systems. The same applies for the Patriot also. (Patriot with shroud)  The main idea is, that if you engage a 2 plane F-16CJ formation, and both Weasels are launching a HARM (half of their total war load for the mission), you can engage parallel the two plane and two incoming missiles, while you still have 2 firing channels free. Both Patriot and S-300 has capabilities to auto lock on incoming ARM's. 
Edited by Hpasp (05/24/12 03:08 AM)
_________________________
Hpasp
Free SAM Simulator, "Realistic to the Switch"
http://sites.google.com/site/samsimulator1972/home
While Fighter Pilots made movies, SAM Officers made History.
(U-2 over Sverdlovsk, B-52's over Hanoi, F-4 Phantoms over the Sinai, F-16's and the F-117A Stealth bomber over the Balkans.)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#3578650 - 05/24/12 02:42 AM
Re: SAM Simulator
[Re: piston79]
|
Member
Registered: 12/31/09
Posts: 1711
Loc: Hungary, Europe
|
Same with NEVA (where FCO is a range tracker), but still he has a light on his panel....
How it is on the SIM (how AI behaves in the SIM?)... It does not simulate RS at all with the NEVA. Only FCO tracking, and AI tracking AS. A Player would not be able to range-track a target, and launch parallel.
Edited by Hpasp (05/24/12 03:09 AM)
_________________________
Hpasp
Free SAM Simulator, "Realistic to the Switch"
http://sites.google.com/site/samsimulator1972/home
While Fighter Pilots made movies, SAM Officers made History.
(U-2 over Sverdlovsk, B-52's over Hanoi, F-4 Phantoms over the Sinai, F-16's and the F-117A Stealth bomber over the Balkans.)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#3578655 - 05/24/12 02:51 AM
Re: SAM Simulator
[Re: piston79]
|
Member
Registered: 12/31/09
Posts: 1711
Loc: Hungary, Europe
|
Hi, guys.. I was thinking about future of the SAM systems...(maybe miliang inspired me  )... Particulary about protection against ARM and other weapons and ATBM capabilities... We all are familiar (thanks to Mr. Hpasp, of course), about russian (USSR) "Dubler" and serbian decoys (based on variouse types of transmitters). I don't want to comment the efficiency of them (at least Col. Dani and his men are all alive), but I was thinking about other batterie (possible) deffensive fitures we didn't discused. Here some of my toughts: 1. Radar/IR/Terrain masking. Watching some videos of night firing on Ashuluk, I've noticed that SAM position was very distinguished in the IR sector even observed true russian IR instruments. I had info about wide variety of IR reducing features (mainly covers from variouse materials), but didn't met info of their applications on SAM systems. Of course the heat of the launch cannot be hidden, but all other stuff (trailers and vans) must be consiled as much as it possible. Terrain masking is used as default. RPN:  
Edited by Hpasp (05/24/12 03:58 AM)
_________________________
Hpasp
Free SAM Simulator, "Realistic to the Switch"
http://sites.google.com/site/samsimulator1972/home
While Fighter Pilots made movies, SAM Officers made History.
(U-2 over Sverdlovsk, B-52's over Hanoi, F-4 Phantoms over the Sinai, F-16's and the F-117A Stealth bomber over the Balkans.)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#3578657 - 05/24/12 03:02 AM
Re: SAM Simulator
[Re: piston79]
|
Member
Registered: 12/31/09
Posts: 1711
Loc: Hungary, Europe
|
The current doctrine is to stand up and fight against one wave of attackers from an unprepared (random) site, than quickly change position and wait for the next wave.
(Thus the deploying and removing of any cover/masking should happen within 5 minutes.)
During the fight, a modern SAM would illuminate all the time, trying to engage Weasels and incoming HARMs parallel. Well, this is possible only for the top armies, which possesed newest SAM systems in huge quontities... Linebacker II is an example of a stand-up fight (which I believe PVO losts due to not enough batteries in my opinion). So, countries with limited military budgets couldn't afort to possesed most advanced SAM systems, so they shold work with what they have. I think, that multi channel, phase shifted fire control radars were rare only during the cold war. Now days, they are common equipment.
List of countries Patriot was exported:NATO Operators Germany Greece Netherlands Poland Spain United States
Other Operators Bahrain Egypt Israel Japan Republic of Korea (South Korea) Kuwait Saudi Arabia Republic of China (Taiwan) List of countries S-300P was exported: Algeria Armenia Azerbaijan Belarus Bulgaria People's Republic of China Cyprus Kazakhstan Slovakia – Inherited from Czechoslovakia. Russia Ukraine United States Vietnam Former operators Czechoslovakia – Passed on to Slovakia in 1993. East Germany Soviet Union I would not consider all of these as TOP ARMIES...
Edited by Hpasp (05/24/12 03:53 AM)
_________________________
Hpasp
Free SAM Simulator, "Realistic to the Switch"
http://sites.google.com/site/samsimulator1972/home
While Fighter Pilots made movies, SAM Officers made History.
(U-2 over Sverdlovsk, B-52's over Hanoi, F-4 Phantoms over the Sinai, F-16's and the F-117A Stealth bomber over the Balkans.)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#3578689 - 05/24/12 05:41 AM
Re: SAM Simulator
[Re: Hpasp]
|
farokh
Member
Registered: 04/22/12
Posts: 612
Loc: IRAN
|
Alas.... Patriot , I wish that system installed in Hungary for best protect 
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#3578694 - 05/24/12 06:19 AM
Re: SAM Simulator
[Re: Hpasp]
|
Member
Registered: 09/02/11
Posts: 873
|
I would not consider all of these as TOP ARMIES... Please, add the number of batteries possesed by those countries, and if you dig deep, what is the density of the coverage over the important objects. Even a modern SAM could be overwhelmed if it is not in a neccesary quontities...
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Previous Topic
Index