Review: Strike Fighters 2: North Atlantic

Forums Articles Events Community Daily News

Forums » SimHQ Community » Article Feedback » Review: Strike Fighters 2: North Atlantic

You are not logged in. [Log In] [Register User]

Page 4 of 4

Topic Options

Rate This Topic

Hop to:

#3540070 - 03/17/12 03:02 AM Re: Review: Strike Fighters 2: North Atlantic [Re: CA_Stary]
Evil Flower Member Registered: 08/10/02 Posts: 455 Loc: Eslöv, Sverige	Originally Posted By: CA_Stary moreover, in screenshot thread, I see that console title being compared to quite ugly (specially..?) SF2NA screenshot.... C'mon? What's wrong with you people? North Atlantic is the new boy to punch? How is it unfair? SF2 just looks like complete #%&*$# out of the box unless you compare it to games that came out in the late 90's. Meanwhile Gaijin's games are always optimized, run at a steady 60fps and generally look really good.
Top

#3540080 - 03/17/12 03:33 AM Re: Review: Strike Fighters 2: North Atlantic [Re: guod]
Magnum Lifer Registered: 01/27/03 Posts: 25729 Loc: Naples, Florida	and they're both sim lites... that post was just a little joke for all the anti-console crap we get here, not meant to be a serious comparison. BTW, I bought the first 2 Strike Fighters games, thought they sucked bad, never bought another one... so I've always hated the series... but thats just me... I still prefer Jane's Longbow 2 and Jane's F-15 for my limited flight action... Armor is King baby! _________________________ Magnum The Xbox 360 brought me from mostly PC gaming to console gaming, The Xbox One is sending me back! Intel i7-2600K processor Cooler Master Hyper N 520 CPU fan Asus ROG Maximus IV Gene-Z mobo 8GB Corsair Vengeance 1600 DDR3 RAM Asus ENGTX570 DCII GeForce 570 video card Western Digital 640GB 7200 w/32MB cache HDD Corsair TX750M power supply Microsoft Windows 7 Home Premium SP1 64-bit
Top

Page 4 of 4

Topic Options

Rate This Topic

Hop to:

Moderator: RacerGT