#3538264 - 03/14/12 11:35 AM
Trimmed to land
|
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,334
Greybeard
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,334
Italy
|
Mybe I'm reinventing the wheel, but would anyway to share how I improved my landing abilities (pretty poor, indeed) lately, increasing elevator trim about 15 "clicks" up before landing. First touch is critical and must be as soft as possible, keeping a/c as long as possible up, like if you would hamper it from touching down, cutting very slowly throttle, since a sharp cutoff would roll a/c upside down.... Curiously, this is much more difficult than in reality, at least with a light aircraft, where you "must" cutoff throttle and that can absorb some shock on landing without jumping like a cricket! I'm speaking of 4.10.1. In 4.11 I think this has been addressed, since I notice much less "ricochet" (that's to say better shock absorbing). Unfortunately, some exaggerated ground effect was added, forcing a/c like FW190 to endless run a few feet over runway, before they touch down. GB
|
|
#3538373 - 03/14/12 03:44 PM
Re: Trimmed to land
[Re: Greybeard]
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,321
rollnloop.
Senior Member
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,321
France
|
I always trim full up during final, it's much easier that way indeed, especially since our joysticks are usually less precise near the stops (but in a real plane it's almost the same, one is less precise when strong force needed), those fighters are usually very nose heavy at slow speed. The other thing is to approach at 1.3 stall speed, if you have trouble with any type of aircraft take it level at 1000m, gear and flaps down, idle power and full trim up, trying to keep altitude as speed comes down. When you feel the first stalling signs, note the speed, push down to recover and once you get 1.3 the stalls speed, increse power to go back level. Do your approach at this 1.3 stall speed, reduce gently power while flaring to get nose higher than horizon and keep it there, then wait. If too high, release the stick almost imperceptibly to limit bounce. If flare was too low and aircraft bounced high (provided gear hasn't collapsed), go around and try again. It's quite comprehensible you don't have as much torque effect when changing power in a light aircraft, most don't have those fighters' 12ft props ! Happy landings
|
|
#3538692 - 03/15/12 01:06 AM
Re: Trimmed to land
[Re: Greybeard]
|
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 3,904
Tolwyn
Senior Member
|
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 3,904
WA, United States
|
Yowza, guys. I neutralize trim as much as I can on a landing, as in real life. Grey, my guess is you're coming in too steep, which is typical for most sim pilots. Most sim pilots want to see the entire run way out their cockpit, when really, you need to approach longer and more shallow. Fly the aircraft TO the runway.
Try the notion of flying the aircraft TO the ground, instead of floating the aircraft onto the ground.
My personal licensing agreement: In exchange for my hard-earned cash for your product, you agree to the following terms: No part of my hardware may be used as a mechanism to verify or reverify my economical patronage. My receipt will serve that purpose. If you disagree with this license, you may return my money to me, and I'll return your product.
|
|
#3538760 - 03/15/12 03:36 AM
Re: Trimmed to land
[Re: Greybeard]
|
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 5,945
Nimits
Hotshot
|
Hotshot
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 5,945
United States of America
|
Really? 'Cause in every plane I've flown, GA or otherwise, I'm trimming after any significant pitch/power change.
Last edited by Nimits; 03/15/12 03:37 AM.
|
|
#3538816 - 03/15/12 07:09 AM
Re: Trimmed to land
[Re: Nimits]
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 51
DGC338
Junior Member
|
Junior Member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 51
Australia
|
With you Nimits. Make a change, hold, trim. Like that in every aircraft I've flown apart from flying at very low level. Trim nose up so If you release you climb. The only other case where I don't trim is in aero's or in FBW aircraft.
"He who knows when he can fight and when he cannot will be victorious." - Sun Tzu III-25.
|
|
#3538851 - 03/15/12 10:09 AM
Re: Trimmed to land
[Re: Greybeard]
|
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,334
Greybeard
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,334
Italy
|
rollnloop
I tried and it works! Curiously, it matches exactly what required by FIAT G50bis Pilot's Manual! Do you trim also for take-off?
Tolwyn
I think your way applies more to a carrier landing (land w/o flare), although I confess I tend to stay high and in a steep descent: an habit coming also from many real landings on a short runway, among relatively high obstacles (wires, trees, buildings). In two years, I too used trim only once, but must be said I flew all short flights.
Nimits, DGC338
That's the right thing to do for long flights, I think, but when you go up for a short time, at low altitude, time spent to balance a/c becomes a significant part of the total and sort of wasting. IIRC, trim should be slightly nose-down, though, otherwise if you release risk stall.
S! GB
|
|
#3539197 - 03/15/12 08:02 PM
Re: Trimmed to land
[Re: Nimits]
|
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 3,904
Tolwyn
Senior Member
|
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 3,904
WA, United States
|
Really? 'Cause in every plane I've flown, GA or otherwise, I'm trimming after any significant pitch/power change. To fly coordinated or to counteract fatigue, right? But do you trim for landing? What I mean is... actively? Well, I guess any adjustment is trimmed (the aircraft is ALWAYS trimmed, I guess). In landing though, I don't know about you, but I wouldn't touch my trim wheel.
My personal licensing agreement: In exchange for my hard-earned cash for your product, you agree to the following terms: No part of my hardware may be used as a mechanism to verify or reverify my economical patronage. My receipt will serve that purpose. If you disagree with this license, you may return my money to me, and I'll return your product.
|
|
#3539363 - 03/16/12 02:37 AM
Re: Trimmed to land
[Re: Greybeard]
|
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 5,945
Nimits
Hotshot
|
Hotshot
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 5,945
United States of America
|
On a GA aircraft in a VFR pattern, it probably depends on where the trim is. Trim button on the yoke, and I am going to at least get the trim moving in the direction of neutral for a short final configuration/descent slope; if it is a wheel on the floor, maybe not. Granted, its not as if the stick forces on a PA-28 or a C-172 is going to be that hard too handle in any reasonable trim/power/CG configuration, but I feel it is good habit.
On anything faster/heavier, though, I'd definately trim for final, especially on a instrument approach, just like I would trim for slow flight, or any other manuevers. Don't know if that is normal or not, but it is the way I've always done it.
|
|
#3540263 - 03/17/12 05:24 PM
Re: Trimmed to land
[Re: Tolwyn]
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,321
rollnloop.
Senior Member
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,321
France
|
In landing though, I don't know about you, but I wouldn't touch my trim wheel. smile Probably the misunderstanding comes from when one considers "landing" start. Of course, aircraft must be trimmed during final, not while flaring. @Greybeard: for take off, i only rudder trim mostly. At start up check wich direction prop is turning over cowling: left to right--->trim rudder right. right to left---->trim rudder left. Trim pitch neutral, then, if after a few take offs you see that this particular aircraft needs much pushing on the stick while leaving ground , trim pitch slightly for dive. If it needs much pulling, trim slightly for climb.
|
|
#3540595 - 03/18/12 11:09 AM
Re: Trimmed to land
[Re: rollnloop.]
|
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,334
Greybeard
Member
|
Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,334
Italy
|
@Greybeard: for take off, i only rudder trim mostly. At start up check wich direction prop is turning over cowling: left to right--->trim rudder right. right to left---->trim rudder left. Trim pitch neutral, then, if after a few take offs you see that this particular aircraft needs much pushing on the stick while leaving ground , trim pitch slightly for dive. If it needs much pulling, trim slightly for climb. Parfait! Thank you, GB
Last edited by Greybeard; 03/18/12 11:10 AM.
|
|
#3541808 - 03/20/12 04:59 AM
Re: Trimmed to land
[Re: Tolwyn]
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 622
Fishingnut
Member
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 622
Good ole' U. S. of A.
|
Yowza, guys. I neutralize trim as much as I can on a landing, as in real life. Grey, my guess is you're coming in too steep, which is typical for most sim pilots. Most sim pilots want to see the entire run way out their cockpit, when really, you need to approach longer and more shallow. Fly the aircraft TO the runway.
Try the notion of flying the aircraft TO the ground, instead of floating the aircraft onto the ground.
Well you sure are different from me then, because I'm also a real life pilot but I usually fly a steep approach in IL2. Mostly because the steeper the approach, the less throttle you need and therefore the torque affects your landing less, so this requires less correcting rudder. Since I come in steeply, I simply start the flare up a bit higher but that's easy to get used to. The lessened torque also means less wing drop to one side if you get a little too slow too high in the flare. I think a real fighter pilots landed fairly steeply in real life mostly so they can get that nice view of the runway that you seem to think is soooo bad. What's wrong with a great view on approach? I just like the 'chop and drop' technique, works well as any other way once you get used to starting to flare a bit higher and the low torque also makes it easier to stay in the enter of the runway without fidgeting with heavy ruddering. As far as using neutral trim like someone suggested, this does not work in the sim well. Nor does it work well for all real-life aircraft either. Try to land a Cessna 182 or 205 with neutral trim and give me a call from your hospital room!! A lot of up trim on most Cessna high winged planes is a good idea because they are notorious for being really nose heavy. Not so much to the 152s or 172s but a 172 still has me trimming up a quite a bit. What types of planes are you guys flying or are some of you just saying your pilots and you're really not?
|
|
#3542158 - 03/20/12 07:43 PM
Re: Trimmed to land
[Re: Greybeard]
|
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 3,904
Tolwyn
Senior Member
|
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 3,904
WA, United States
|
I never said having a big view was bad! I meant that because of the nature of the game (monitors) sometimes you come in steep so you CAN see the whole runway. I've never flown any high-performance aircraft. I was very much speaking in generalities, but I tend to fly the airplane TO the runway instead of floating it ONTO the runway. Maybe I just didn't say it right. Hey, I think you should do whatever works for you in the game. I wasn't preachin' ! Hmmm. I've not ended up in the hospital yet. Although I've never flown a 205. I'm more of the 152, 172 variety, so my experience seems limited. I'm a pilot. Got lots of video, however, i'ts getting too expensive and my 10 year old makes it hard for me to justify the cost anymore. I did see a Citabria at Oshkosh 2 years back and I SO SO SO wanted to buy it. Oh, man. Didn't even know they still manufactured them.
My personal licensing agreement: In exchange for my hard-earned cash for your product, you agree to the following terms: No part of my hardware may be used as a mechanism to verify or reverify my economical patronage. My receipt will serve that purpose. If you disagree with this license, you may return my money to me, and I'll return your product.
|
|
#3542206 - 03/20/12 09:14 PM
Re: Trimmed to land
[Re: Greybeard]
|
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 5,945
Nimits
Hotshot
|
Hotshot
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 5,945
United States of America
|
For GA, PA-28-140/150,mostly; C-172 at times, a little in a DA-20C. Personally never cared for the C-172, but their is an FBO about 5 minutes from where I live now that has a couple of C-172s, while the closes Pipers or Diamonds are 30-45min away (and in the opposite direction of where I'd want to go cross country).
IRL, flat approaches can appear easier, I've seen, but I've found most CFIs prefer steeper approaches for visual patterns, mainly on the theory that if the engine quits, you can still make the runway.
Last edited by Nimits; 03/20/12 09:14 PM.
|
|
#3542806 - 03/21/12 07:11 PM
Re: Trimmed to land
[Re: Greybeard]
|
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 3,674
EinsteinEP
Just a Noob
|
Just a Noob
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 3,674
Tucson, AZ
|
Trim doesn't change how far the elevator can go, just the force needed by the pilot to maintain a given control position for a given aircraft condition (weight, airspeed, altitude, etc.). Folks going from nimble/light aircraft, like the Cessna 152, often have problems with the additional oomph needed to flare in a heavier aircraft like the C172 or C182 on their first few flights. Trimming does help reduce the force required to flare, but it doesn't magically extend the elevator. It's possible that whoever was having problems with landing that Cessna was trimmed for level flight (more nose down), not descent (more nose up), which is a big difference. Had they been trimmed properly, even with a forward CG, they would have had no problem controlling the aircraft through touchdown.
Setting the trim to full nose up causes problems not only for the pilot who flies afterwards and doesn't check their trim wheel (see Fishingnut's great learning story above) but could also be a significant problem for the landing pilot: trying to execute a go around by pushing in the power will cause the aircraft to pitch up sharply, losing airspeed and causing the pilot to fight the controls to prevent a stall. In fact, I'd go so far as to say that setting the trim full in any direction is always a bad idea - the trim should be set to just what is needed, no more, no less. If a pilot needs full trim one direction or the other to maintain control of the aircraft, they're probably in more trouble than they realize.
In real life, I was taught to trim often and I found it really helped the stability and smoothness of my flying. I learned to trim whenever I felt any force on the yoke, including simply maneuvers like level turns (tilt the yoke with one hand to begin the turn, spin the trim wheel down a couple times with the other to maintain altitude, reverse the process for leveling out). Trim, trim, trim, trim, trim, trim, trim... Took a lot of the work out of my arms and put it into the trim tabs, which never complained about the extra duty.
There are pilot preferences on whether or not to trim a force against the stick or to trim forces out (aka neutral trim). My preference is to trim neutral (i.e., no input force needed to maintain descent attitude) and have used this approach in real life on Cessna 152s, 172s, 140s, Piper cubs (J-3), PA-12 Super Cruisers, and a Stinson 108 and also have not spent any time in a hospital.
Shoot to Kill. Play to Have Fun.
|
|
#3543047 - 03/22/12 01:25 AM
Re: Trimmed to land
[Re: EinsteinEP]
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,834
Boilerplate*
Viceroy of Huntly
|
Viceroy of Huntly
Hotshot
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,834
Virginia, USA
|
Trim doesn't change how far the elevator can go, just the force needed by the pilot to maintain a given control position for a given aircraft condition (weight, airspeed, altitude, etc.). Folks going from nimble/light aircraft, like the Cessna 152, often have problems with the additional oomph needed to flare in a heavier aircraft like the C172 or C182 on their first few flights. Trimming does help reduce the force required to flare, but it doesn't magically extend the elevator. It's possible that whoever was having problems with landing that Cessna was trimmed for level flight (more nose down), not descent (more nose up), which is a big difference. Had they been trimmed properly, even with a forward CG, they would have had no problem controlling the aircraft through touchdown.
Setting the trim to full nose up causes problems not only for the pilot who flies afterwards and doesn't check their trim wheel (see Fishingnut's great learning story above) but could also be a significant problem for the landing pilot: trying to execute a go around by pushing in the power will cause the aircraft to pitch up sharply, losing airspeed and causing the pilot to fight the controls to prevent a stall. In fact, I'd go so far as to say that setting the trim full in any direction is always a bad idea - the trim should be set to just what is needed, no more, no less. If a pilot needs full trim one direction or the other to maintain control of the aircraft, they're probably in more trouble than they realize.
In real life, I was taught to trim often and I found it really helped the stability and smoothness of my flying. I learned to trim whenever I felt any force on the yoke, including simply maneuvers like level turns (tilt the yoke with one hand to begin the turn, spin the trim wheel down a couple times with the other to maintain altitude, reverse the process for leveling out). Trim, trim, trim, trim, trim, trim, trim... Took a lot of the work out of my arms and put it into the trim tabs, which never complained about the extra duty.
There are pilot preferences on whether or not to trim a force against the stick or to trim forces out (aka neutral trim). My preference is to trim neutral (i.e., no input force needed to maintain descent attitude) and have used this approach in real life on Cessna 152s, 172s, 140s, Piper cubs (J-3), PA-12 Super Cruisers, and a Stinson 108 and also have not spent any time in a hospital. Yes. That's the way I remember using trim in Flight Simulator II back in 1985.
It's a Game.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exodus
by RedOneAlpha. 04/18/24 05:46 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|