#3519545 - 02/16/12 03:05 AM
Re: F4BMS graphics are struggling
[Re: cjcrank]
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 224
Dr Meltdown
Member
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 224
Texas
|
It looks like this is what you have: http://www-947.ibm.com/support/entry/portal/docdisplay?lndocid=MIGR-58662It has a PCI-E x16 video card slot, which is what all the new cards use (newer PCI-E 2.0 cards are backward compatible). So... the next thing to consider is the space inside the case and the power supply. The site I found says the power is 530W which should be ok, but check a video card requirements before making a purchase. Case size/ space for video card can be tricky. But, a GeForce 560 or 570 should be ok in most regular size cases. They are a double wide card so make sure you have the room (I'm not familiar with the size of your current card). I recommend a GeForce 560 Ti. They seem to be the best bang for buck value of the current line of Nvidia cards. You may also need an adapter or two for power if your power supply does not have the correct plugs (almost all new video cards include these) Good luck. The card I mentioned can be found around a $200 price range. If price is an issue, consider a 560 (non-Ti model) or 550. With your monitor resolution, you may be ok with a card with 512mb ram, but most higher end cards have 1gb.
-Dr Meltdown
|
|
#3519578 - 02/16/12 04:34 AM
Re: F4BMS graphics are struggling
[Re: cjcrank]
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 224
Dr Meltdown
Member
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 224
Texas
|
If you're planning to go to Triple Head to Go (and I assume you're talking Matrox, and not Nvidia or ATI solution which would require even more consideration to video cards), go with the best card you can afford. With TH2G, keep in mind you will be increasing your resolution by a factor of 3, generating greater load on the graphics card.
I have not tried F4 BMS, so I cannot comment on what it needs. But in general, the better the graphics card, the better performance. Maybe see if you can get more advice from BMS players.
-Dr Meltdown
|
|
#3519664 - 02/16/12 10:17 AM
Re: F4BMS graphics are struggling
[Re: cjcrank]
|
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 16,082
- Ice
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 16,082
Philippines / North East UK
|
cj, I would suggest to go with the best card you can afford, either nVidia or AMD line. If you already have the Triple Head 2 Go hardware, then you can consider nVidia. If not, buy an AMD card --- AMD does Eyefinity which is basically like TH2Go but does it from the card itself, no need to buy TH2Go. nVidia needs the TH2Go hardware to work, AMD doesn't. what is going to be the difference between the 560ti, 560 non-ti and the 550? i would rather go with the 1gig card if that will help. Do note that with Windows XP SP3, I am assuming you are working with a 32-bit OS. That extra 1GB of video RAM is not going to be utilized fully, as 32-bit OS can only use 3.5-4GB of RAM. Have you considered upgrading to a 64-bit OS? Like Win7 Home 64-bit? Let me point you to this graphics card heirarchy chart. It is not 100% accurate and the same cards within the same tier do perform better/worse than the other cards on the same tier, but it is a good rough guide. I used to have a AMD HD 5770 which is 8 levels from the top and it could play BMS with no problem. Might be a bit slower on triple screen though. You will want the best card you can afford, basically because if you upgrade the rest of your rig later on, you can take this card with you. Maybe the 4th or 5th level cards (nVidia GTX 570 or 560 Ti; AMD HD 6970 or 6950), these are good "just behind the curve" cards that is a good balance between performance and cost. Which card in particular is up to you, your needs, and your budget. However, Falcon 4 BMS isn't exactly your cutting-edge game with all the eye candy so if you are on a tighter budget, you can go up to level 8 or thereabouts. I know my HD 5770 is now replaced by a 6770 which sells for about £70-80, so that is quite cheap. I would also recommend buying a beefier power supply unit, if nothing but to make sure you don't fry anything when you upgrade. Hope that helps!
- Ice
|
|
#3519908 - 02/16/12 06:03 PM
Re: F4BMS graphics are struggling
[Re: cjcrank]
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 17,632
SkateZilla
Skate Zilla Graphics
|
Skate Zilla Graphics
Veteran
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 17,632
Virginia Beach, VA
|
need a ActiveDisplayPort -> DVI/HDMI/VGA Adapter to use eyefinity, as one unit needs to be plugged into Active Display Port
Last edited by SkateZilla; 02/16/12 06:13 PM.
HAF922, Corsair RM850, ASRock Fata1ity 990FX Pro, Modified Corsair H100, AMD FX8350 @ 5.31GHz, 16GB G.SKILL@DDR2133, 2x R7970 Lightnings, +1 HD7950 @ 1.1/6.0GHz, Creative XFi Fata1ity Platinum Champ., 3x ASUS VS248HP + Hanns�G HZ201HPB + Acer AL2002 (5760x1080+1600x900+1680x1050), Oculus Rift CV CH Fighterstick, Pro Throt., Pro Pedals, TM Warthog & MFDs, Fanatec CSR Wheel/Shifter, Elite Pedals Intensity Pro 10-Bit, TrackIR 4 Pro, WD Black 1.5TB, WD Black 640GB, Samsung 850 500GB, My Book 4TB
|
|
#3519991 - 02/16/12 07:04 PM
Re: F4BMS graphics are struggling
[Re: cjcrank]
|
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 37
Robb
Junior Member
|
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 37
Canada
|
I can't really tell if that CPU is a single core, if it is don't waste any money on it. I only bring it up because the fx 3400 was released in 04
Intel 980X @ 4.2GHz / EVGA Classified X-58 / EVGA GTX 780SC / Corsair Dominator GT 12GB(2000) / Corsair HX1050 / Corsair H100 / Corsair 800D / Samsung 840 Evo 250GB / Crucial M4 256GB / Sound Blaster Z / TrackIR 4 & Track Clip Pro / Logitech G940-G25-G19-G9x / Acer HN274H 120hz / Win 8 Pro 64-Bit
|
|
#3520008 - 02/16/12 07:19 PM
Re: F4BMS graphics are struggling
[Re: cjcrank]
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 17,632
SkateZilla
Skate Zilla Graphics
|
Skate Zilla Graphics
Veteran
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 17,632
Virginia Beach, VA
|
quadro fx is a workstation card, not a gaming card,,, yes, it makes a difference, that is your main issue, plus its only got 256mb of ram, BMS significantly upgraded F4's engine to DX9, so They recommend at least a DX9 512mb GFX unit.
CPU is also a Workstation CHIP, with a Workstation Chipset, Single Core w/ HyperThreading. Xeon 3.4, 3400 MHz, 1024 KiB, 800 MT/s, 17x, 1.287-1.4 V, 103 W, Socket 604, June 28, 2004, RK80546KG0961M, $690
You'd be better off buying a prebuilt $500 "Gaming" PC to play BMS, than upgrading around your current system, As your current system was setup for Workstation functions and Not gaming.
Last edited by SkateZilla; 02/16/12 07:20 PM.
HAF922, Corsair RM850, ASRock Fata1ity 990FX Pro, Modified Corsair H100, AMD FX8350 @ 5.31GHz, 16GB G.SKILL@DDR2133, 2x R7970 Lightnings, +1 HD7950 @ 1.1/6.0GHz, Creative XFi Fata1ity Platinum Champ., 3x ASUS VS248HP + Hanns�G HZ201HPB + Acer AL2002 (5760x1080+1600x900+1680x1050), Oculus Rift CV CH Fighterstick, Pro Throt., Pro Pedals, TM Warthog & MFDs, Fanatec CSR Wheel/Shifter, Elite Pedals Intensity Pro 10-Bit, TrackIR 4 Pro, WD Black 1.5TB, WD Black 640GB, Samsung 850 500GB, My Book 4TB
|
|
#3520177 - 02/16/12 10:03 PM
Re: F4BMS graphics are struggling
[Re: cjcrank]
|
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 37
Robb
Junior Member
|
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 37
Canada
|
I think a single core CPU for gaming is a deal breaker. I doubt its powerful enough even with a better card to push a single monitor at higher resolutions.
Intel 980X @ 4.2GHz / EVGA Classified X-58 / EVGA GTX 780SC / Corsair Dominator GT 12GB(2000) / Corsair HX1050 / Corsair H100 / Corsair 800D / Samsung 840 Evo 250GB / Crucial M4 256GB / Sound Blaster Z / TrackIR 4 & Track Clip Pro / Logitech G940-G25-G19-G9x / Acer HN274H 120hz / Win 8 Pro 64-Bit
|
|
#3520204 - 02/16/12 10:38 PM
Re: F4BMS graphics are struggling
[Re: cjcrank]
|
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 16,082
- Ice
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 16,082
Philippines / North East UK
|
cj, you can always purchase the card you want and if it doesn't work, you can use the card on any new system you build. I am not very sure about Falcon 4 and single-core, but seriously dude, it might be time to consider an upgrade. I am assuming you are using this system as your home computer? It might be great for everyday tasks but not for gaming. Like I mentioned earlier, my old card was a HD 5770, and it supports Eyefinity and as it plays DCS A10C fine, I am confident it can more-than-handle Falcon 4 BMS (not 100% sure since I am still starting on BMS). Here is the product page on XFX for my 5770. Note the third picture, you see ports for two DVI cables on the right side (newer version of VGA cable that connects your card to the monitor) and two (?) HDMI ports. I have yet no experience regarding active display adapters vs passive ones and why you need the active ones so I'll leave that for the others to discuss. But let me point you to Tom's Hardware Guide Best Graphics Cards For The Money: February 2012 it is a nice place to start your research as it gives a "best card for [insert budget here]". Perhaps if you post your budget limit and requirements, people can give you more accurate suggestions. Note I said "suggestions," whether you buy it or not, whether it does comform to your needs or not, is always up to you to decide.
- Ice
|
|
#3520220 - 02/16/12 10:53 PM
Re: F4BMS graphics are struggling
[Re: - Ice]
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 17,632
SkateZilla
Skate Zilla Graphics
|
Skate Zilla Graphics
Veteran
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 17,632
Virginia Beach, VA
|
cj, you can always purchase the card you want and if it doesn't work, you can use the card on any new system you build. I am not very sure about Falcon 4 and single-core, but seriously dude, it might be time to consider an upgrade. I am assuming you are using this system as your home computer? It might be great for everyday tasks but not for gaming. Like I mentioned earlier, my old card was a HD 5770, and it supports Eyefinity and as it plays DCS A10C fine, I am confident it can more-than-handle Falcon 4 BMS (not 100% sure since I am still starting on BMS). Here is the product page on XFX for my 5770. Note the third picture, you see ports for two DVI cables on the right side (newer version of VGA cable that connects your card to the monitor) and two (?) HDMI ports. I have yet no experience regarding active display adapters vs passive ones and why you need the active ones so I'll leave that for the others to discuss. But let me point you to Tom's Hardware Guide Best Graphics Cards For The Money: February 2012 it is a nice place to start your research as it gives a "best card for [insert budget here]". Perhaps if you post your budget limit and requirements, people can give you more accurate suggestions. Note I said "suggestions," whether you buy it or not, whether it does comform to your needs or not, is always up to you to decide. The I/O Panel from Left to Right. DisplayPort, HDMI, and 2x DVI-I Dual Link. Eyefinity Rules are that One Screen be connected to the DisplayPort to use Eyefinity. So if you already have 3 screens, just get a ActiveDisplayPort -> DVI/VGA Adapter.
HAF922, Corsair RM850, ASRock Fata1ity 990FX Pro, Modified Corsair H100, AMD FX8350 @ 5.31GHz, 16GB G.SKILL@DDR2133, 2x R7970 Lightnings, +1 HD7950 @ 1.1/6.0GHz, Creative XFi Fata1ity Platinum Champ., 3x ASUS VS248HP + Hanns�G HZ201HPB + Acer AL2002 (5760x1080+1600x900+1680x1050), Oculus Rift CV CH Fighterstick, Pro Throt., Pro Pedals, TM Warthog & MFDs, Fanatec CSR Wheel/Shifter, Elite Pedals Intensity Pro 10-Bit, TrackIR 4 Pro, WD Black 1.5TB, WD Black 640GB, Samsung 850 500GB, My Book 4TB
|
|
#3523315 - 02/21/12 11:28 AM
Re: F4BMS graphics are struggling
[Re: cjcrank]
|
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 16,082
- Ice
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 16,082
Philippines / North East UK
|
How'd we get from upgrading GPUs to upgrading CPUs? Although a quick glance over the BMS forums and they say BMS is a bit CPU-intensive as well.
If you are going to upgrade your CPU, you will need a new motherboard as well and the type of motherboard will depend on the type of CPU you decide on. At this point, you will also need some RAM since most of the motherboards now are DDR3.
- Ice
|
|
#3523318 - 02/21/12 11:43 AM
Re: F4BMS graphics are struggling
[Re: cjcrank]
|
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 8,839
Allen
Hotshot
|
Hotshot
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 8,839
Ohio USA
|
FWIW, I'm an AMD fan with an Eyefinity setup (see signature) and some other computers in the house. AMD is the best solution for 3 monitor gaming right now. All the new AMD HD7xxx series cards physically can do 3 monitors -- as do most of the "last model year" HD6xxx cards. One of the three monitors must have a "Displayport" connection -- the other two can be "DVI" or HDMI. If one does not have monitors with those connections, then adapters can be bought (assuming there is none "in the box"). Usually, it works best if all three monitors are identical size and resolution. With three monitors, there are 3 times as many pixels to "draw" -- and most folks use 1920x1080 monitors leading to a total resolution of 5760x1080. So, a "lightweight" card that works great with one monitor, would be too slow for most folks when used with three. For example, my brand new HD7750 Home Theater PC (HTPC) card (cheapest HD7xxx made) plays very well at 1920x1080 single monitor (I recommend at least an HD7770 for a gaming rig -- probably fine for F4 and a single monitor). However, HD7750 would not stand a chance with three 1920x1200 monitors (as I use on my main gaming rig). Of course, one could get 3 1680x1050 -- less pixels -- still no chance with an HD7750. If one wants to try 3 monitors on a budget, HD6870 and up or HD7850 and up (HD7850 to be released shortly) will be OK with three 1920x1080 (based on my experience). With those cards, the half-dozen most difficult graphical games may not be playable at max-everything settings (F4 is not tough graphically); however, one does not need max everything to have a great gaming experience. If money is no object, the clear solution for three monitors is the HD7970. I'll probably replace my two HD5870 with one of these. Meanwhile, old games only use a single core of a CPU. Most newer games only use two cores well. I just tried using our new HTPC and HD7750 with all but two cores turned off while playing Skyrim at max-everything with big add on textures -- to make a long story short, worked as well as 4 cores and 6 cores. You might get by with your single core CPU. If not, Skatezilla had the right idea -- time for a new computer -- very cost effective -- and a world of difference. If you try a new graphics card first and find your old CPU is not enough, you can simply buy a new low cost system without a card and transfer the card. Should you ever get to the point of wanting to upgrade fully, just post here. Lots of folks willing to make good suggestions -- that you'll have to pick from
Sapphire Pulse RX7900XTX, 3 monitors = 23P (1080p) + SAMSUNG 32" Odyssey Neo G7 1000R curve (4K/2160p) + 23P (1080p), AMD R9-7950X (ARCTIC Liquid Freezer II 420), 64GB RAM@6.0GHz, Gigabyte X670E AORUS MASTER MB, (4x M.2 SSD + 2xSSD + 2xHD) = ~52TB storage, EVGA 1600W PSU, Phanteks Enthoo Pro Full Tower, ASUS RT-AX89X 6000Mbps WiFi router, VKB Gladiator WW2 Stick, Pedals, G.Skill RGB KB, AORUS Thunder M7 Mouse, W11 Pro
|
|
#3523324 - 02/21/12 12:28 PM
Re: F4BMS graphics are struggling
[Re: Allen]
|
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 16,082
- Ice
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 16,082
Philippines / North East UK
|
Should you ever get to the point of wanting to upgrade fully, just post here. Lots of folks willing to make good suggestions -- that you'll have to pick from I could never understand how so many people (ladies mostly) can spend so much time "just shopping" for new clothes, shoes, bags, etc. and going from store to store and moaning about all the possible choices. Then I remember how I was when researching and picking my new system specs. Same "concept," different applications. Now I understand when they say "it's fun!"
- Ice
|
|
#3523598 - 02/21/12 07:50 PM
Re: F4BMS graphics are struggling
[Re: cjcrank]
|
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 8,839
Allen
Hotshot
|
Hotshot
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 8,839
Ohio USA
|
Systems run a gamut of prices. To make good suggestions regarding a "balanced" approach, we need to know what you are willing to spend. You seem to be willing to "spend what it takes" within reason. A first class system with an HD7970 GPU for Eyefinity will probably run over $1100 -- maybe over $1500-- that's for the computer (no monitors). Monitors run from three for $450 to three for $1500+ in the size and resolution most folks are happy with. For many sim players, the cheaper monitors will do (whew ). One can save money various ways. Shop sales and build it yourself to save significant cash and get exactly what you want (with no warranty -- except for RMA replacement of bad individual components) -- many here do that. Others pick components and have the computer built to their specs -- costs more and includes warranty. Etcetera. The real trick is to know what's important and what's not to FPS and Eyefinity. One does NOT need the best of everything. Rather, one needs components known to do the job -- usually, there are multiple good choices -- get the sale-priced one -- that's where SimHQ folks come into the picture. Anyhow, what's the budget
Sapphire Pulse RX7900XTX, 3 monitors = 23P (1080p) + SAMSUNG 32" Odyssey Neo G7 1000R curve (4K/2160p) + 23P (1080p), AMD R9-7950X (ARCTIC Liquid Freezer II 420), 64GB RAM@6.0GHz, Gigabyte X670E AORUS MASTER MB, (4x M.2 SSD + 2xSSD + 2xHD) = ~52TB storage, EVGA 1600W PSU, Phanteks Enthoo Pro Full Tower, ASUS RT-AX89X 6000Mbps WiFi router, VKB Gladiator WW2 Stick, Pedals, G.Skill RGB KB, AORUS Thunder M7 Mouse, W11 Pro
|
|
#3523623 - 02/21/12 08:33 PM
Re: F4BMS graphics are struggling
[Re: cjcrank]
|
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 16,082
- Ice
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 16,082
Philippines / North East UK
|
Of course, pre-built gaming rigs will cost, especially the "brand name" ones. So why spend so much when you can build one for yourself?
To help you along this path, we would need to know your current system (I see it's linked above, but have you made any changes? Like what monitor size are you working with now?), and how much you plan to spend. We know that you want to play DCS A10C and Falcon 4 BMS, though I do believe DCS is the more graphics-intensive game and F4BMS is an older game so while it may not tax the GPU so much, it may give the CPU a sweat.
Off the bat, I'd say you might want a 22-24 inch monitor to start with. I know you said you wanted triple-screen gaming, but look at what monitors cost to start with and see if you have any money left over after spec-ing out your system. A 500GB hard drive should do, or a 1TB drive for more storage. Or you could keep your current drive. Got more money? Look into 64GB or 128GB SSDs. DDR3 RAM is dirt cheap these days so 8GB of dual-channel 1600MHz should be easy. A PSU of at least 700W will give you good overhead, though you can probably get by with a lower-power PSU, but I prefer that extra.
Now for the most important and most expensive bits -- your CPU, GPU, and motherboard selection. Allen is a big fan of AMD CPUs, and they are good value-for-money. Or you can get the second generation i5 CPUs if you want to go nVidia. Basically, a good quad-core CPU is what you are looking for. Again, your CPU choice will then dictate your motherboard selection; once you've picked your CPU, I'm sure a lot of people can recommend a good board for it. The GPU we've already discussed.
Good luck!
- Ice
|
|
|
|