#3496447 - 01/17/12 11:30 AM
Re: Hurricane IIc's 213 Squadron, Egypt 1942-3
[Re: iron mike]
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 795
Col.J.D.Landers
Member
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 795
London, England.
|
Beautiful work again Mike!!
“The temptation to form premature theories upon insufficient data is the bane of our profession.” - Sherlock Holmes
|
|
#3496519 - 01/17/12 02:49 PM
Re: Hurricane IIc's 213 Squadron, Egypt 1942-3
[Re: iron mike]
|
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 7,097
Skylark
Old Timer's Club Member
|
Old Timer's Club Member
Hotshot
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 7,097
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
|
Nice work Mike and I did notice Ray's hand in improving the model. Well done to you both. Cheers David
|
|
#3496638 - 01/17/12 06:03 PM
Re: Hurricane IIc's 213 Squadron, Egypt 1942-3
[Re: iron mike]
|
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,215
Pobs
Hotshot
|
Hotshot
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,215
North Wales, UK
|
Lovely work Mike Thanks for all the time and effort cheers, Pobs
|
|
#3497674 - 01/18/12 10:47 PM
Re: Hurricane IIc's 213 Squadron, Egypt 1942-3
[Re: iron mike]
|
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,248
PeterMBooth
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,248
Pontypridd, South Wales,UK
|
Hi Guys,
The rather strange nose camo is probably down to me as I sent Mike a profile of it. Clearly non-standard field application - not sure how or why it came about but I have seen profiles of the same aircraft fom 3 different sources including an old "Profile Publications" which are usually pretty accurate, but no actual photo of it so far. Of course if the original source was wrong and the other 2 copied it then it may not be correct - difficult to tell. I will have to see if I can find an actual photo but for the moment I will assume it is genuine. If any of you find pics that either confirm of otherwise please let either me or IM know. It certainly seems to have grabbed your attention, which is not bad. And in answer to your question John, perhaps you are right - a couple of seconds uncertainty by the enemy could just save your life I suppose!
Cheers,
Pete
With increasing age should come wisdom and tolerance, but as the saying goes, "there is no fool like an old fool" as I prove regularly!
|
|
#3498020 - 01/19/12 11:42 AM
Re: Hurricane IIc's 213 Squadron, Egypt 1942-3
[Re: iron mike]
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,261
AngleOff
Member
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,261
PA., USA
|
Thanks Pete. Ralf, the IIC will need a FM. Mike, isn't there already a IIc fm in the planes folder? (slot 09fm) AO
|
|
#3498049 - 01/19/12 01:00 PM
Re: Hurricane IIc's 213 Squadron, Egypt 1942-3
[Re: PeterMBooth]
|
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 7,064
Sandbagger
Hotshot
|
Hotshot
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 7,064
Coningsby, Lincs, UK
|
Alienware Aurora R5 Windows 10 64 bit Intel i7-6700K 4.2Ghz Two GTX 1080 Foundations in SLI (8 Gig each) 32 Gig DDR4 2133Mhz 1TB SSD boot drive - 1TB SATA storage drive 5.1 Surround Sound 34" Dell Ultra Sharp U3415W (3440x 2440) CH Pro-Pedals, Stick and Throttle TrackIR-5 Pro
|
|
#3498561 - 01/19/12 10:20 PM
Re: Hurricane IIc's 213 Squadron, Egypt 1942-3
[Re: iron mike]
|
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 13,341
Col. Gibbon
A nobody
|
A nobody
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 13,341
|
Two things AO. The first is the PHurBex.pcx (the cannon) and the hard points on the model. The first wings Ray sent over don't have the hard points so they work for the .303 armed machines. But, since we can't have two or more different FMs flying from the same slot( yet) the planes need to have the same arms.
That's right Mike. that was the final part of the MS project. Admittedly more for WWI than WWII, where mixed flights were more common, Mike's mixed Hurricanes is just as valid, as would be P51 B' and D's together, different Mk's of Spitfire, and lots of different P38's!
Supports EAW 1.29.exe, Drop in and Play Technology. 1.29 download
|
|
#3498648 - 01/19/12 11:29 PM
Re: Hurricane IIc's 213 Squadron, Egypt 1942-3
[Re: iron mike]
|
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,248
PeterMBooth
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,248
Pontypridd, South Wales,UK
|
Hi Guys,
Mike (Sandbagger) - as you say a very interesting link - perhaps this particular Hurri was intended to fool the Italians/Germans - who knows.
Aldo, I am no expert on FM but I think the following points are relevant. Firstly the guns and ammo have a certain weight and a 20mm cannon and shells weigh more than the equivalent Browning 0.303 mg and bullets so that has a small effect on the aircraft performance, particularly when you have 4 cannon in the Hurricane Mk IIc compared with 8 x 0.303 Brownings in the MkI and MkIIa and 12 in the MkIIb. The MkIIc is going to be a little bit slower and more sluggish though the other thing is that the engine was upgraded and more powerful so that counteracted the weight quite a bit, which is another thing the FM should allow for. In the tropical versions it gets even more complicated as to stop sand getting in to the air intake and ruining the engine various forms of filters were fitted. The Me 109 had a rather slim filter which probably had a limited effect on performance, but factory built Spitfires and Hurricanes had the very bulky Vokes filter under the nose which knocked at least 20mph of the top speed. To try and improve things a locally built "Aboukir" filter was often fitted which was a lot smaller and had far less detrimental effect. Again a good FM will model the changed performance.
Secondly, and far more important, if you are flying the model and try and shoot at an enemy aircraft, the FM determines how many guns you have, where they are, how much ammo you have, what your rate of fire and effective range is, and how much damage they can do. So if you are flying a Hurricane MkIa with 8 Brownings and find yourself behind a nice fat He 111, then if you have set max realism and have only 15 seconds worth of ammo and your aim is as bad as mine, you will probably need a 10 second burst at close range to shoot it down, whereas with a MkIIc with 4 cannon and rather less ammo you could blow it up with a short burst from greater range. And of course the FM determines what you see when the guns fire so you get 8, 12 or just 4 streams of tracer heading for the target, depending on which Mark you are flying.
Take an example. John (Col Gibbon) has been working on a model of the Handley Page Hampden for 3 years but unless somebody comes up with a decent FM for it, it will be at best inaccurate to use in EAW (the JU88 FM might work fairly well perhaps) and at worst a waste of time. The FM determines amongst other things the defensive guns and their field of fire, the range/speed at various altitudes, the overall performance in terms of speed and manoeuverability, the fuel and bomb load. That is how important FM are and it seems very few persons on the forum know how to make them fairly accurately.
Sorry it is a bit of a lecture but I hope that answers your question.
Cheers,
Peter
With increasing age should come wisdom and tolerance, but as the saying goes, "there is no fool like an old fool" as I prove regularly!
|
|
#3498669 - 01/19/12 11:46 PM
Re: Hurricane IIc's 213 Squadron, Egypt 1942-3
[Re: iron mike]
|
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 13,341
Col. Gibbon
A nobody
|
A nobody
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 13,341
|
Hi Peter. I suppose I worked on the Hampden about a month, to get it where it is today. But having to build the wings distance models, damaged wings, etc, leaves me a bit cold. If I did not have three children to look after, a house to keep clean, various illnesses, for which I take 9 tablets daily, which leave me in a state of sleepiness until around Midday, and my bad hands, I would have finished shed loads of models by now. My low output is of great distress to me, and just adds to my depression.
Supports EAW 1.29.exe, Drop in and Play Technology. 1.29 download
|
|
|
|
Exodus
by RedOneAlpha. 04/18/24 05:46 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|