Forums » Air Combat & Civil Aviation » IL-2: Cliffs of Dover » IL-2: Cliffs of Dover - Extended Discussions » Battle for Moscow sequel will be... Active Topics You are not logged in. [Log In] [Register User]
Page 2 of 9 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 >
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
Hop to:
#3488431 - 01/05/12 06:52 PM Re: Battle for Moscow sequel will be... [Re: HeinKill]
cheesehawk Offline
Member

Registered: 02/23/11
Posts: 605
Loc: CA, USA
For me? sitting on the shelf until I know they've fixed all the major bugs in CoD, and not introduced any new ones. + they will have to put at least a good bit of the stuff CoD was promised but is missing in. Then, I might be tearing it up in a Yak or MiG! wink


Top
#3488438 - 01/05/12 07:03 PM Re: Battle for Moscow sequel will be... [Re: cheesehawk]
Icarus1 Offline
Member

Registered: 11/02/09
Posts: 538
+1 cheesehawk.
_________________________
System Specs:
Main: i7 3930k @4.8Ghz, 32Gb 2133 Ram, GTX 580 3Gb SLI, 256Gb Samsung 830 SSD + 600Gb + 2x 300 Gb VelociRaptors, 1.5kw PSU, Recon 3D Fatal1ty,Logitech Z-5500 5.1 Surround, 30" Samsung LCD + 24," Logitech G11, 3X CH MFP's, Cougar MFD's, Cougar FSSB-R2 + Simpeds, TrackIR5.
Secondary: Core2 Extreme QX6850 3.00 Ghz, 8Gb RAM, GTX 580 + GTX 260 , 120Gb Ocz Vertex 2 SSD + 160Gb VelociRaptor, SB X-Fi Extreme Gamer, 2 x 19"Samsung LCD's, 2x 8" VGA, 2x 7" TFT's,1000W PSU

Top

#3488443 - 01/05/12 07:08 PM Re: Battle for Moscow sequel will be... [Re: HeinKill]
KRT_Bong Offline
It's KRT not Kurt
Senior Member

Registered: 11/05/07
Posts: 2505
Loc: Gulf Coast of Florida
Not a very fair Poll IMHO all the answers are negative and suggest that anyone answering doesn't want to fly the Eastern Front, not that I'm interested in the Eastern Front mind you but to be fair one must assume there will be those who would. Personally I'd like the Med/North Africa but that's me. If all the installments are to be merged ala 1946 then I would have to have it to be able to join a server that has it no matter what map might be running.
_________________________
Windows 7 32 SP1
Gigabyte GA770 probably obsolete already
AMD Phenom II X4 3.1Ghz really an X3 unlocked and overclocked
ATI HD 5830 1Gb 256 bit it was cheap
4 x 1Gb GSkill 1333Mhz looks pretty on the MB
X-Fi Xtreme Creative Soundcard - cheap pair of headphones

"She put carbolic in my coffee, turpentine in my tea, Strychnine in my biscuits, Lord but she didn't hurt me." Furry Lewis / Big Chief Blues

Top
#3488462 - 01/05/12 07:39 PM Re: Battle for Moscow sequel will be... [Re: WynnTTr]
kilosierra Offline
Member

Registered: 06/28/08
Posts: 1341
Loc: The very north of Germany
Originally Posted By: WynnTTr
I'd bet it's leaning towards more English speaking, familiar Western aircraft simmers that want to see more of the aircraft I mentioned in my first reply than the il2. In fact the poll results, such as they are right now, shows exactly that.


lol,

I can`t see the "results" as this "poll" is obviously a joke and I refused to take part in it, so I can`t see the "results".

Do yourself a favour and read the "Black Cross Red Star" books from Bergstrom and Mikhailov and learn what interesting part of a WWII air warfare you are dismissing. It can be "entertaining" even when no P-51 or P-47 are involved.
_________________________
i7 2600k @ 4,5 GHz
Asus GTX570
Asus P8P67
8 GB RAM
SB Audigy Gamer
128 GB Crucial M4 SSD
Samsung F3 1 TB
BeQuiet E8-700 W
Thermalright Archon
Samsung SyncMaster BX2450 LED
W7 64 Pro

Top
#3488465 - 01/05/12 07:40 PM Re: Battle for Moscow sequel will be... [Re: KRT_Bong]
-Avatar- Offline
Senior Member

Registered: 11/08/02
Posts: 3981
Loc: CT, USA
Originally Posted By: KRT_Bong
Not a very fair Poll IMHO all the answers are negative and suggest that anyone answering doesn't want to fly the Eastern Front, not that I'm interested in the Eastern Front mind you but to be fair one must assume there will be those who would...


All negative? confused

Quote:
More exciting than a wardrobe malfunction on a Bolshoi ballerina


How is that considered negative? Unless you think a partially naked Russian ballerina as something bad... neaner

I think Heinkill was trying to appeal to the average males hormones with that answer and therefore is considered VERY positive. smile
_________________________
Avatar

Asus P8Z68 Deluxe, i7 2700k @4.7GHz, EVGA GTX570HD 301.42s, 1x120gb SSD, 2x150gb WD Raptors, 2x200gb SATA, 16gb G.Skill DDR3 2130, 1000W PS, HP DVD-RW, Onboard sound, 32" Sony Bravia XBR, Win7 Pro 64bit, Tai Chi watercooled case

Top
#3488479 - 01/05/12 08:19 PM Re: Battle for Moscow sequel will be... [Re: HeinKill]
KRT_Bong Offline
It's KRT not Kurt
Senior Member

Registered: 11/05/07
Posts: 2505
Loc: Gulf Coast of Florida
Okay, I hadn't considered that they might actually be attractive, I was thinking a mannish looking woman with big shoulders and no boobs.. eek2


Edited by KRT_Bong (01/05/12 08:21 PM)
_________________________
Windows 7 32 SP1
Gigabyte GA770 probably obsolete already
AMD Phenom II X4 3.1Ghz really an X3 unlocked and overclocked
ATI HD 5830 1Gb 256 bit it was cheap
4 x 1Gb GSkill 1333Mhz looks pretty on the MB
X-Fi Xtreme Creative Soundcard - cheap pair of headphones

"She put carbolic in my coffee, turpentine in my tea, Strychnine in my biscuits, Lord but she didn't hurt me." Furry Lewis / Big Chief Blues

Top
#3488481 - 01/05/12 08:20 PM Re: Battle for Moscow sequel will be... [Re: kilosierra]
WynnTTr Offline
Member

Registered: 03/20/09
Posts: 595
Originally Posted By: kilosierra
Originally Posted By: WynnTTr
I'd bet it's leaning towards more English speaking, familiar Western aircraft simmers that want to see more of the aircraft I mentioned in my first reply than the il2. In fact the poll results, such as they are right now, shows exactly that.


lol,

I can`t see the "results" as this "poll" is obviously a joke and I refused to take part in it, so I can`t see the "results".

Do yourself a favour and read the "Black Cross Red Star" books from Bergstrom and Mikhailov and learn what interesting part of a WWII air warfare you are dismissing. It can be "entertaining" even when no P-51 or P-47 are involved.

That's nice but utterly irrelevant to what we're discussing about where the site is and what the poll is about.

I'm sure that's a good book but what's that got to do with this poll on SimHQ?

Your choice to disregard the poll as rubbish but it's what we're talking about and for you to dismiss data entirely because it doesn't suit your argument shows that you can't be reasoned with. Anything I say will just be met with another anecdote and possibly another reference to some irrelevant book.

Top
#3488483 - 01/05/12 08:21 PM Re: Battle for Moscow sequel will be... [Re: HeinKill]
Nimits Offline
Senior Member

Registered: 04/23/02
Posts: 4211
Loc: Texas, United States of Americ...
Originally Posted By: kilosierra
While the server might be located in the US, you may have noticed, the public here is quite international.

I like this decision, since it opens a wide variety of missions and planes, German, Russian and Lend Lease.

Same old Europe or Pacific, no thanks, seen them too often since Dynamix and Micropose days.


Err, those sims are 10-20 years old. There has been much more sim coverage of the Eastern Front in recent years than Europe and Pacific. If we are arguing from variety's/non-repetitiveness's sake, PTO or MTO are better options. Neither has been done well in over a decade.

It is to be expected a Russian flight sim company will make a sim about themselves. Maybe they will be more enthusiastic about the single player for the Eastern Front than they were for BoB . . . maybe not. I just hope the people defending 1Cs making a game about the (relatively) unknown in the west IL-2 will not be the same ones clamoring the next time an American or British company makes a game or movie about the Yanks and Brits in WWII . . .

Either way, Eastern Front holds minimal interest for me (just slightly more than WWI). I'd much prefer PTO, CBI, or MTO. But above all, I'd prefer a game that works.


Edited by Nimits (01/05/12 08:26 PM)

Top
#3488490 - 01/05/12 08:25 PM Re: Battle for Moscow sequel will be... [Re: Nimits]
WynnTTr Offline
Member

Registered: 03/20/09
Posts: 595
Originally Posted By: Nimits
It is to be expected a Russian flight sim company will make a sim about themselves. Maybe they will be more enthusiastic about the single player for the Eastern Front than they were for BoB . . . maybe not. I just hope they people defending 1Cs making a game about the (relatively) unknown in the west IL-2 will not be the same ones clamoring the next time an American or British company makes a game or movie about the Yanks and Brits in WWII . . .

Either way, Eastern Front holds minimal interest for me (just slightly more than WWI). I'd much prefer PTO, CBI, or MTO. But above all, I'd prefer a game that works.

+1

Top
#3488598 - 01/05/12 11:33 PM Re: Battle for Moscow sequel will be... [Re: HeinKill]
Hackl Offline
Member

Registered: 10/28/01
Posts: 2293
Loc: Kelowna, BC,Canada
I don't think many westerners want to admit how good Russian aeroplanes really were.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AN1-5BP0xSU

Top
Page 2 of 9 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 >
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
Hop to:

Moderator:  RacerGT 
 

Forum Use Agreement | Privacy Statement
Copyright 1997-2013, SimHQ Inc. All Rights Reserved.