Hi John,

I've re-read all the posts in this thread and couldn't find any expressions of direct criticism
but rather only observations and/or opinions of personal likes and dislikes.

I think that it maybe a good idea to have both options (rotating verse non-rotating)
available to the community and let the end user decide which to use.

and I whole heartily agree with your closing statement...
"There are only 6 days left until Christmas. Lets enter the time of good will unto all men, in peace and harmony."



Cheers mates and Merry Christmas to all
David

PS: John, delete that email immediately

Mike,

as a totally uninvolved observer on this thread can I just add the comment that I didn't read any of the comments as personal attacks or critisisms of your work per se, only indications of some peoples own preferences in terms of some of the features, perhaps you are a bit too close to this project and feel offended by people's comments but I am sure they were not meant to hurt or offend.

The community here has a great deal of respect for the work you have been doing and will hopefully continue to do.




cheers,


Pobs

I am thinking here that because I didn't repaint the prop hub from the static version that the rotation (read shadow) is seen as a problem. The shadow should disappear and the rotation help conceal the nacelle problems that I had hoped to hide. I am going to repaint it and test it to prove my theory. I'm not going to put that skin back out unless the rendering problems are corrected. There are too many folks who wouldn't like having the upper wing camo displaying on the underside of the wing to put out a glide version.


Meanwhile later that evening...

Hubs repainted to white (the shadow has been overpainted)...

black prop cones IM....the luftwaffe
'owls' would have a 'field day' spotting
white ones...

Rgr that, this is a test for the transparencies...

all good...

can't be giving knegel any advantages for
online nightfighter missions..lol

I damaged him once!