I'm hoping they will add some decent features with FC3, the just having the triggers of A-10C in FC is fine by me. However, I am somewhat worried that without some improvements to the avionics of FC3 aircraft that the sims won't mesh well together.

Take the radios for example. Radio frequencies matter in DCS. You gotta tune to the correct frequencies to contact ATC, JTAC, to hear (or not hear) AI flights, and so on. FC2 had what is considered to be "easy radios" where everything is tuned to the correct frequency automatically. So with AI flight to communicate with the player there is bound to be a constant and unavoidable noise of AI chatter. Granted it all depends on the number of AI in a scenario, but having no options to switch frequencies would really suck.

I'm just glad they're supporting it.

There was enough of a difference between FC 1.1 and FC2 that it warranted me paying for it.

There is already enough of an indication that there is significant differences to warrant me paying for FC3.

You ain't lying,I have had it for about a year now and am still loving it.I'm really hoping for mfd extracting and maybe few new aircraft in fc3

I'd love to see if they update the area around Sochi with some of the stuff for the Olympics in a couple of years... I was just thinking about this the other day. But I'm with PFunk about any update being a good update. Especially from DCS.

There will be new features, at least where the ME is concerned as you have guessed. Possibility for anything more isn't being discussed publicly for now since nothing has been nailed down (that I know of, I don't make the decisions).

I wouldn't worry too much about the avionics. The FC series serves the crowd that isn't into exacting operation, but there's nothing wrong with meshing DCS and FC. Basically, if you consider facing off with a fighter, an FC fighter and a DCS fighter would appear to fight about the same; in fact a DCS fighter will likely have advantages in avionics.

But in the end, it all depends on how you want to fly, and so you'd join an appropriate server or crowd I imagine

The Dynamic Campaign is the Holy Grail to so many sim fans. Even those who dismiss the concept as a simple illusion fooling ignorant players who don't understand the tricks under the hood must appreciate the swell of pent up desire for a F4-style DC. I've recently been playing on the excellent 74th VFS server, in both the BS and A-10. Tyger's mission is the best MP mission I've ever played in DCS. But after 3 flights I knew most of the spawn points. (yes there is a huge amount of random AI placement but the linear flow of the mission is impossible to avoid) It becomes almost comical when we on comms act surprised at those vehicles that just popped up east of "Flick". I ask you, Is this more real than the aggregations and deaggregations found in the F4 Campaigns??? I LOVE A-10. I just hate building sandboxes for it. And without a dynamic campaign where players can chose their packages, targets and loadouts and return day after day to see how the war progresses, Naveda is just another sandbox.

Yeah, a dynamic campaign would give thse titles everlasting appeal. I mean just look at Falcon 4.0.

I play 100% online now so a dynamic campaign doesn't interest me unless it has online functionality. Besides in my experience a well designed mission beats a DC generated mission almost any day. But to each their own I do know many play solo offline so the desire for a DC generator is big.

I only fly online also, but with F4/BMS DC even if you fly sp it feels like you are flying online. Flying the same missions is boring and it sucks. How fun is it knowing where everything all the time, basically whats going to happen. FC3 needs to have the UI that BMS has, meaning you can change your waypoints, change your weapons and set up flights. If you merge BMS with DCS then we would have a very good flight sim....having the best of both worlds.

Any idea when the list of features/changes/enhancements FC3 will have is going to be announced?

BS2's "well, it's here, check the readme" method was, shall we say, LESS than ideal.



The Jedi Master