Reading about the objectives, I am curious if the designers realize that Wick (or Dundas, or most any other fighter pilot) did not actually shoot down all the planes they were credited with. If you have to match Wick's score in actual planes shot down (vs planes claimed shot down), you are really doing something superhuman . . .
Interesting theory, impossible to prove, of course, but interesting anyway.
My opinion differs as i don't like such generalisations.
Shores/Cull, Ford, and Lundstrom (among others) have proved it in regards to the PTO/CBI; similar work has been done for the the ETO (most of which I have admittedly not yet read). Shoot, we know the Luftwaffe overclaimed significantly during BoB . . . otherwise, they actually would have knocked the RAF out of the sky in the first couple of weeks of the battle, had their claims been true. And they knew it. Just about every intelligence service in WWII used some fraction of aircraft reported shot down when calculating actual damage done to the enemy.
Reminds me of this

.
"AIR VICE MARSHAL EVILL
[ACM Dowding is sitting at his desk reading reports. The phone buzzes. AVM Evill picks up the phone] Yes? [listens] Yes, one moment [turns to ACM Dowding] The Air Minister, sir. on the scrambler.
MARSHALL SIR HUGH DOWDING
[picks up green scrambler phone] Yes?
MINISTER
Ah, Dowding. Er. Look. Our people in Washington are having trouble with the American Press. It's about today's figures. German sources there are saying that our claims are wildly exaggerated.
MARSHALL SIR HUGH DOWDING
[listens, but says nothing]
MINISTER
Hello? Are you there Dowding?
MARSHALL SIR HUGH DOWDING
I'm here Minister.
MINISTER
Well I mean, can you verify the figures?
MARSHALL SIR HUGH DOWDING
[clears throat] I'm not very interested in propaganda. If we're right, they'll give up. If we are wrong, they'll be in London in a week!