Sounds pretty amazing.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/22/technology/22camera.html?_r=1

Looks interesting - I'll be keeping an eye out for their future developments.

Can I say I am impressed? Yes.

However...

I don't see this as a game changer for professionals or semi-professionals.

Some things that stood out to me about the article:

Did not list the file size of a photo taken. How many of this types of photos will fit on a standard 16gb card? With all that extra data it'll be a massive file.

What are the actual camera specifications? Do I get 1 fps or 10 fps?

No hobbist or professional will buy a camera solely because it takes a blur free photo. What good is the blur free photo if the equipment and image quality is sub-par?

Besides you can always post edit them to focus on what you want.

I wonder how this will work, you can already see the difference of trying to sharpen a picture too much. I can't imagine the distortion of trying to focus on a different subject. From shooting my kids lacrosse I've had my focus jump to one of the other kids which sucks but is the nature of photography...

Thats a very good question TG, how will this work?

Surely you cannot focus on to something else if the camera doesnt already know what that something else looks like...and Ive gone all crossed eyed!

Regards

Mailman

I imagine it will be like all advances , in no time at all it will be as if we could possibly have never lived without it.Our kids will look at our old pics and go what, you couldnt change the focus point??? boring. Looks very cool.