|
|
#3322479 - 06/19/11 10:32 AM
Another rookie camera question!
|
Member
Registered: 10/27/99
Posts: 2304
Loc: Halifax, NS, Canada
|
Still continuing my crash course on cameras with my (sorta) impending first SLR purchase, and I've figured out something which I HOPE is true.. Hoping someone might be able to confirm.
Probably the thing I'm most interested in is shooting pics of airplanes as they pass over, especially the in flight refueling activities. My current camera, an S1IS has an image sensor which is a 2.0x factor to a 35mm camera. I also have an adapter that permits me to add a 1.7 converter that I have. So my current 35mm is:
58mm(the camera's max lens)* 2 (the conv factor) * 1.7 (my converter) = 197.2mm
The T3i I'm looking at has 1.6 conversion factor and I'm hoping to get a 250mm lens so it'd be
250 * 1.6 = 400mm equivalent. Multiply that by 1.7 if I get a 58-52mm thread adapter and it's 680mm
So by this logic, if it's right, I'll actually be getting more zoom with my new camera than my old one, even with a just ok length lens of 250mm.
Is this true? I hadn't counted on getting more magnification with my new camera, but I'm hoping it is. Thanks
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#3322513 - 06/19/11 11:16 AM
Re: Another rookie camera question!
[Re: tomcat]
|
Air Combat & General Aviation Editor
Hotshot
Registered: 09/28/04
Posts: 5480
Loc: California
|
I don't know if all the math works, but there may be some technical issues that may keep things from working out the way you're thinking. I'm not sure what 1.7 adapter you're referring to, but it may not work on that lens/camera. Also, if it reduces the amount of light getting to the AF sensor, and it probably will, the AF may not work anymore.
Also, the 1.6 crop doesn't exactly increase zoom, it reduces the field of view, so it may not end up offering more detail, just a tighter view, which may still be advantageous.
_________________________
Ken Cartwright No single drop of rain feels it is responsible for the flood. http://www.techflyer.net
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#3322560 - 06/19/11 12:16 PM
Re: Another rookie camera question!
[Re: tomcat]
|
Member
Registered: 10/27/99
Posts: 2304
Loc: Halifax, NS, Canada
|
The 1.7 will probably just be an attempt, I'll be holding it in front of the lens just for a test.. Not really practical to shoot like that all the time. It's nothing special anyway, it's an addon lens that you could buy for a mid range Olympus camera at one point. Certainly not the same quality as an actual teleconverter that goes between an SLR and lens. At any rate it sounds like I will still be happy with the zoom level on the new camera, which is good because it's one thing I like about my current camera, it's just obviously not exactly current any more.
Thanks for the help!
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#3323028 - 06/20/11 05:19 AM
Re: Another rookie camera question!
[Re: tomcat]
|
Lifer
Registered: 01/02/01
Posts: 20532
Loc: Vienna, 2nd rock left.
|
The 400mm math is correct. It does kind of "increase zoom" as the object you are looking at fills more pixels on the sensor.
Still, 400mm in total is not a whole lot for what you seem to have in mind.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#3323046 - 06/20/11 05:45 AM
Re: Another rookie camera question!
[Re: tomcat]
|
Member
Registered: 10/27/99
Posts: 2304
Loc: Halifax, NS, Canada
|
Yeah I'm not expecting to be able to read registration codes or see Boom Operators waving, but I've looked at airliners.net for 400mm equivalent shots and they seem better than what I can shoot now. Plus cropping some will be an option too. I think I'll be fairly happy, just wish there was a less pricy option for big zoom without big bucks.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#3323505 - 06/20/11 02:49 PM
Re: Another rookie camera question!
[Re: tomcat]
|
Member
Registered: 03/16/06
Posts: 954
Loc: Dayton, OH
|
I just picked up a 75-300mm for $9.95 on eBay so you might want to be a little patient and shop around for a while.
_________________________
Service To The Line, On The Line, On Time
US Army Ordnance Corps.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#3323518 - 06/20/11 03:13 PM
Re: Another rookie camera question!
[Re: MajorMagee]
|
Air Combat & General Aviation Editor
Hotshot
Registered: 09/28/04
Posts: 5480
Loc: California
|
I just picked up a 75-300mm for $9.95 on eBay so you might want to be a little patient and shop around for a while. Wow, that's scary cheap. Have you received it yet? If so, how well does it work? Are you sure it's not stolen? 
_________________________
Ken Cartwright No single drop of rain feels it is responsible for the flood. http://www.techflyer.net
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#3323519 - 06/20/11 03:14 PM
Re: Another rookie camera question!
[Re: tomcat]
|
Member
Registered: 10/27/99
Posts: 2304
Loc: Halifax, NS, Canada
|
Holy crap! That's a 200.00 lens even if it's not the IS one. Let us know how it is when it arrives please!
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#3323701 - 06/20/11 08:53 PM
Re: Another rookie camera question!
[Re: tomcat]
|
Member
Registered: 03/16/06
Posts: 954
Loc: Dayton, OH
|
_________________________
Service To The Line, On The Line, On Time
US Army Ordnance Corps.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#3323864 - 06/21/11 03:23 AM
Re: Another rookie camera question!
[Re: tomcat]
|
Member
Registered: 10/27/99
Posts: 2304
Loc: Halifax, NS, Canada
|
Wow. Is it a Canon lens? I found six 75-300 lenses last night under 50 bucks on eBay, will see where they end up at.
Edited by tomcat (06/21/11 03:23 AM)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#3323886 - 06/21/11 04:22 AM
Re: Another rookie camera question!
[Re: tomcat]
|
Member
Registered: 03/16/06
Posts: 954
Loc: Dayton, OH
|
It's an Vivitar lens for an Olympus OM mount. I have a Micro Four Thirds PEN E-PL1, and with the right adapter just about any lens can be used with it.
_________________________
Service To The Line, On The Line, On Time
US Army Ordnance Corps.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |