Yo,
I couldn't get much advice about going dual-band wifi, so I took a blind leap. Here's what I found out. Please note these quick (read: sloppy) little tests aren't up to scientific standard, and aren't on even ground in a some ways. There need to be some upstream tests, with different file sizes, both run in N only mode. Also, there shouldn't have been any other devices on the 2.4Ghz - which there were, but interestingly it didn't cripple the 2.4Ghz network much.
I bought a Linksys E3000 Router and WMP600N Dual-Band PCI adapter . I tried 5ghz to avoid the noise in my area - a lot of packets were getting resent (which may have had more to do with my old router, than interference).
Anyway, some quick & qualitative observations:
5ghz has really limited range and object penetration. The direct signal path is ~40 feet - down 1 floor, through 3 walls (of course, wireless signals bounce so this may not be the actual path). I tested this on a laptop MiniPCIe Intel 5100ABGN, not the linksys - I've already returned it & I explain why below.
I did some quick downstream file transfer test between my desktop (wired, gigabit ethernet) and laptop using a 500MB and 1GB file. I'm showing you the screen from the 500MB file test, which is representative of everything else (I got lazy and only took one screenshot). Note I took the screen early on the 2.4ghz test, so add an extra second to that one.
5GHZ:
2.4Ghz :
Note the 5ghz was set to use channel bonding on N-mode only, whereas 2.4 was set to 20mhz only in mixed b/g/n mode. Moreover, there was an active g device on the network, so all of this should have put 2.4Ghz at a disadvantage. Yet, the transfer remained slightly faster in 2.4Ghz in all of the downstream file transfers (1GB & 500GB)
To make this more useful, I should have adjusted some settings to make the networks as similar as possible before comparing them. So nothing AT ALL definitive here, just my results. I'm interested to hear yours.
Some other important things to note: the linksys adapter is the only dual-band PCI card I can find at major online retailers, so I figure someone else might be looking at them. The card was pretty bad. Picture the above graphs with more troughs and peaks instead of a plateau - more latency & many wild throughput dips. It's a Ralink-based wireless chipset (of which I've owned 4) and they've all exhibited the same problems. The antennas were also weak - 2dbi (I don't blame the router, I got good-great signal from every adapter but the Linksys). File transfers peaked at 6MB/s, with averages btw 2-3. I'll be waiting for another vendor to make one; personally, I'm partial to Atheros (and hoping Intel makes some PCI cards too).
While searching for some better dual-band antennas, I was hard pressed to find any that didn't cost at least twice as much as the card itself. Not many aftermarket options here unless you're willing to spend some serious money.
So, I'm going to try a more inventive & surprisingly cheap approach - I'm going to grab a MiniPCI-e to PCI-E adapter, pop in an Intel Dual-Band wifi card, salvage some laptop antennas from a busted laptop and run them out of the rear I/O slot - mostly for the sake of experimentation. I just want to see what gives good results when the market is currently offering so few options. I'll post back when/IF it works