|
|
|
#3159955 - 12/18/10 12:11 PM
Re: Next Aircraft for ROF
[Re: totalspoon]
|
Hotshot
Registered: 01/08/02
Posts: 6538
Loc: England
|
The 2 seaters will be more attractive if there's unique game modes connected to them.
- Photo recon doesn't sound too hard to implement, take pics of the terrain from a certain hight, return to base and review them. Mission success, medals etc for taking the correct pics at the right hight.
- Arty ranging could work using a clickable icon on screen, watch the hits on the ground and tell the battery to adjust depending on the hits. Mission success, medals etc depending on number oh hits, target value.
Trying to complete these missions while fending off enemy scouts or strings of flaming onions would be quite immersive I think.
- Throwable weapons Ground attack 2 seaters could have throwable grenades to lob over the side from the observers position, German crews were quite keen on their potato mashers apparently.
All this stuff requires extra programming of course.....
_________________________
WAS C2D 8500 3.16ghz, 285gtx 1gb, 4gig ram, XP NOW Win7 64, I5 2500K, SSD, 8Gig ram, GTX 570
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#3159987 - 12/18/10 01:14 PM
Re: Next Aircraft for ROF
[Re: totalspoon]
|
Junior Member
Registered: 11/14/10
Posts: 77
Loc: San Diego, CA
|
I like the way RoF has a broad spectrum of planes. I'm interested in the "big name" birds that were historically important. So, I'm one of those guys more pleased by the inclusion of the DH2 and Eindecker then by the fact that the D7 has both the early and F version.
Does the wider history range mean there's a lot of "missing" planes from the late war? Sure, but if I have to pick, I want to have a chance to fly wildly different aircraft, just to get a feeling for that "what was it like?". The first time I fought in an E3, I was totally like "ZMOG, I knew on an intellectual level how fragile and underpowered these were...but!"
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#3160002 - 12/18/10 01:48 PM
Re: Next Aircraft for ROF
[Re: totalspoon]
|
Member
Registered: 09/15/10
Posts: 1216
|
I'm with MouseOne. I'm very glad that the sim has the broad range of historical workhorses. If I were to criticize the inclusion of any scout, it would be of course the Fokker D.VIII, due to its lack of historical significance, but I'm not seriously complaining about it. I love the D.H.2, E.III, Nieuport 17, and other early war crap planes.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#3160033 - 12/18/10 02:59 PM
Re: Next Aircraft for ROF
[Re: totalspoon]
|
Lifer
Registered: 01/02/01
Posts: 21266
Loc: Vienna, 2nd rock left.
|
What Moster said... If Arty Ops and Photo Work could be simulated, I'd be flying a two-seater.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#3160057 - 12/18/10 03:29 PM
Re: Next Aircraft for ROF
[Re: totalspoon]
|
Two-speed Five-Blade Fan
Senior Member
Registered: 11/19/01
Posts: 3199
Loc: Canada
|
I like the grenades as an idea. Any aircraft with a reasonable sized cockpit should be able to carry a few (like flares - but in the armament screen).
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#3160241 - 12/18/10 08:56 PM
Re: Next Aircraft for ROF
[Re: Josh Echo]
|
Member
Registered: 07/05/09
Posts: 963
Loc: Nashville, TN USA
|
I'm with MouseOne. I'm very glad that the sim has the broad range of historical workhorses. If I were to criticize the inclusion of any scout, it would be of course the Fokker D.VIII, due to its lack of historical significance, but I'm not seriously complaining about it. I love the D.H.2, E.III, Nieuport 17, and other early war crap planes. Agreed...I absolutly adore the older machines. I'll happily take the N11,DH-2, or Eindecker since fighting in them means that energy management is the critical factor. Unlike the late war turn fighters that so often get into endless round and round fights, you pretty much have to get into vertical maneuvers in the older ones. Sure, they're slow and primitive and short on power, but that makes for a more cerebral combat experience. The more early planes that come along, the happier I'll be! While I enjoy the more capable planes I'm happy to leave most of the combat in them to the adrenaline junkies. Oh...and I'm sure looking forward to the Gotha to go with the HP. I know you don't like large planes, Josh, but flying it is again more like playing chess in having to think ahead and plan your moves in it. I'm loving the ways this sim's evolution is going. =MFC=Gunloon
_________________________
Love. You can know all the math in the 'Verse, but take a boat in the air you don't love, she'll shake you off just as sure as the turning of worlds. Love keeps her in the air when she oughtta fall down, tells ya she's hurtin' 'fore she keens. Makes her a home.
Captain Malcolm Reynolds, Serenity
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#3160422 - 12/19/10 06:40 AM
Re: Next Aircraft for ROF
[Re: Avimimus]
|
Hotshot
Registered: 01/08/02
Posts: 6538
Loc: England
|
I like the grenades as an idea. Any aircraft with a reasonable sized cockpit should be able to carry a few (like flares - but in the armament screen). I'd like to keep it to aircraft were references suggest they were used. Late war German army co-op 2 seater crews are recorded as taking throwable grenades with them, even to the point of overloading the aircraft. It'd make a nice unique feature for the CL ground attack planes. I'm not too sure about the Entente side, fighter bomber single seaters seem to have been used more.
_________________________
WAS C2D 8500 3.16ghz, 285gtx 1gb, 4gig ram, XP NOW Win7 64, I5 2500K, SSD, 8Gig ram, GTX 570
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#3160580 - 12/19/10 11:59 AM
Re: Next Aircraft for ROF
[Re: RSColonel_131st]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 02/04/08
Posts: 2958
Loc: Redlands, CA
|
But then, I think most agree that RoF was always driven by the online community, so it seems that duels at 3000 feet in excotic scouts are more it's focus than the ability to generate semi-historical randomized SP campaigns. This is definitly something that both OFF3 and FE2 do better.
You could not be more wrong about what drives ROF. Jason
_________________________
777 Studios / 1C Games Studios - Proud Developer of Rise of Flight: The First Great Air War and IL-2 Sturmovik: Battle of Stalingrad. The Best WWI and soon to be WWII Simulations on the PC!
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#3160584 - 12/19/10 12:02 PM
Re: Next Aircraft for ROF
[Re: Mogster]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 02/04/08
Posts: 2958
Loc: Redlands, CA
|
Of course there's a commercial pressure to sell add-on aircraft, famous, exciting aircraft will sell best. Its understandable that 777 have so far focused on these aircraft, I think aircraft perceived as being "good" for MP have been at the top of the list also.
There's a poll thread over at the ROF board suggesting that 80% of people with ROF (not a valid sample technique I know) have bought all the add on planes. Maybe this will make 777 more confident in making less well known or less exotic planes, there was some concern I think that 2 seater aircraft might not be big sellers. It appears that the drip drip of new planes at very reasonable prices has proved a success. And you couldn't be more wrong as well. Two-seaters have not been sold simply because we did not have the support built for them. Plain and simple. Now we do, so we will build them. And you are also wrong about building planes that were good for MP. And the polls people post in our forum are not in any way an accurate representation of anything. Jason
_________________________
777 Studios / 1C Games Studios - Proud Developer of Rise of Flight: The First Great Air War and IL-2 Sturmovik: Battle of Stalingrad. The Best WWI and soon to be WWII Simulations on the PC!
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#3160621 - 12/19/10 12:48 PM
Re: Next Aircraft for ROF
[Re: 777 Studios - Jason]
|
Veteran
Registered: 04/15/02
Posts: 13361
|
But then, I think most agree that RoF was always driven by the online community, so it seems that duels at 3000 feet in excotic scouts are more it's focus than the ability to generate semi-historical randomized SP campaigns. This is definitly something that both OFF3 and FE2 do better.
You could not be more wrong about what drives ROF. Jason Listen, RS_Colonel has a visceral hatred for the whole basic way that RoF works, he's just in here to badmouth the sim as he best can, don't bother with him...
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |