do you not read post, just reply new guy?
I'm not sure what you mean here. I guess your asking whether I actually read the posts, or do I just compose replies based on the response to some neural spasm. Then adding the "new guy" suffix to assert yourself as all the things your forum signature denotes. OK fair enough, I guess. Are you also on the Steel Beasts dev team? Is that why you took my post so seemingly personally?
Believe me, I come in peace. My point was that Charlie901 indicated there was enough crewable vehicles already and he would rather see something like shadows added. My feeling was that for an upgrade to a combat vehicle sim it should include a combat vehicle(s) that a guy could "use" IE crewable, and that for tactical reality sake, I would rather see something like the ATGM graphics addressed, rather than (yes, desirable) shadows.
I'm trying to play nice here, Magnum. Relax. I'm just looking for answers that weren't available over at SB .com (until recently)
Jack