|
|
#3031025 - 06/14/10 08:09 AM
LOOK AT THESE BOMBERS
|
Junior Member
Registered: 05/23/10
Posts: 13
|
Who is copying who? B1 Bomber vs Tu-160 Bomber 
Edited by john84 (06/14/10 08:09 AM)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#3031143 - 06/14/10 10:25 AM
Re: LOOK AT THESE BOMBERS
[Re: john84]
|
Member
Registered: 02/03/02
Posts: 403
Loc: Charlotte
|
So which came first??? The chicken or the egg?
_________________________
DFord8 aka SlapStik Intel i7 2600K SB, DDR3 1600 8 gb ram, Win7 64, EVGA GTX 570 1280gb, Intel 80gb SSD. TM Warthog #1547, MFD pack, CH PP & TIR4
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#3031151 - 06/14/10 10:35 AM
Re: LOOK AT THESE BOMBERS
[Re: SlapStik]
|
Member
Registered: 04/06/08
Posts: 2264
Loc: UK
|
A bit like Concorde and the Tu-144.
If 2 different design teams wanted to make a supersonic airliner,would they come up with something similar because that is the best shape?
You can't help but think about the B-29 that the Russians got hold of and copied wholesale,even down to the 'Boeing' on the foot pedals.The Tu-4.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#3031259 - 06/14/10 01:13 PM
Re: LOOK AT THESE BOMBERS
[Re: Chucky]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 12/17/03
Posts: 3053
|
The Tu-160 is not a copy; it is larger, and much faster than a B-1 as well. That it happens to look the same - who cares. F-15's and Su-27's look the same (sort of at least - 2 wings, 2 engines, 2 tails, single pilot?  ) and yet they don't perform the same.
_________________________
-- 44th VFW
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#3032089 - 06/15/10 12:06 PM
Re: LOOK AT THESE BOMBERS
[Re: GrayGhost]
|
Member
Registered: 10/15/99
Posts: 693
Loc: Baltimore, MD USA
|
They copied our planes. Don't let anyone say different!
_________________________
ASUS Maximum Formula Intel E6850 overclocked to 3.80 BFG Geforce 295OC 6 Gig DDR2 Plenty of storage Windows 7 64bit
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#3032101 - 06/15/10 12:15 PM
Re: LOOK AT THESE BOMBERS
[Re: specialksl]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 12/17/03
Posts: 3053
|
Might claim that things like the delta dart were a copy of russian designs too 
_________________________
-- 44th VFW
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#3032798 - 06/16/10 09:53 AM
Re: LOOK AT THESE BOMBERS
[Re: GrayGhost]
|
Working on it
Member
Registered: 07/31/06
Posts: 640
Loc: Barksdale AFB, La
|
The egg!
_________________________
6600 @ 2.4, Windows 7 64-bit, 4GB, 8800GT, CH HOTAS, TrackIR 5, Cougar MFD's
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#3034861 - 06/18/10 06:13 PM
Re: LOOK AT THESE BOMBERS
[Re: Cali]
|
Member
Registered: 03/16/06
Posts: 941
Loc: Dayton, OH
|
For that matter the B1A looks like the B1B but they are far different aircraft both in mission and capabilities.
_________________________
Service To The Line, On The Line, On Time
US Army Ordnance Corps.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#3053353 - 07/16/10 01:03 AM
Re: LOOK AT THESE BOMBERS
[Re: Cali]
|
Junior Member
Registered: 06/24/09
Posts: 10
Loc: Brisbane, Australia
|
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#3057663 - 07/22/10 06:47 AM
Re: LOOK AT THESE BOMBERS
[Re: SlapStik]
|
Member
Registered: 12/27/01
Posts: 1064
Loc: Toronto
|
So which came first??? The chicken or the egg? The egg comes first at breakfast,,,,then the chicken is second because it's for lunch.
_________________________
Most of my Friends are Imaginary
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#3057743 - 07/22/10 09:13 AM
Re: LOOK AT THESE BOMBERS
[Re: jack72]
|
Member
Registered: 04/16/02
Posts: 1193
Loc: Almere,Flevoland,the Netherlan...
|
I think i'll wait for the Le Bourget presentation.............
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#3057821 - 07/22/10 10:29 AM
Re: LOOK AT THESE BOMBERS
[Re: the Dutchman]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 09/15/04
Posts: 4240
Loc: Oregon
|
Eggs came first, clearly. Always did. Long before there were chickens, there were eggs.
_________________________
Eugene
CoreDuo E6850 MSI P6N 680i Diamond BFG N460 GTX Cyclone 1GD5 OC Forceware 280.26 X-Fi Xtreme Gamer WinXP Pro 2 gig RAM Saitek X52 PRO.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#3059045 - 07/24/10 12:39 AM
Re: LOOK AT THESE BOMBERS
[Re: jack72]
|
Junior Member
Registered: 08/30/05
Posts: 70
|
The Russian "borrowed" design of the B1, same to F-15 and Mig-25, it's said that some parts of F-15 derived from MiG-25 design.
_________________________
-- LQA --
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#3077999 - 08/22/10 03:45 AM
Re: LOOK AT THESE BOMBERS
[Re: mirage2310]
|
Member
Registered: 01/26/08
Posts: 139
Loc: Northern Ontario, Canada
|
If youtube is any indication, Americans will rant and rave endlessly when somebody copies their weapons; But if it's the other way around, the only Americans making a sound are the crickets.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#3078057 - 08/22/10 06:44 AM
Re: LOOK AT THESE BOMBERS
[Re: mirage2310]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 12/17/03
Posts: 3053
|
Neither is copied. The aircraft are far too different. The B1 is too small by comparison, the F-15 is too maneuverable compared to the MIG-25. The Russian "borrowed" design of the B1, same to F-15 and Mig-25, it's said that some parts of F-15 derived from MiG-25 design.
_________________________
-- 44th VFW
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#3078589 - 08/23/10 01:05 AM
Re: LOOK AT THESE BOMBERS
[Re: GrayGhost]
|
Junior Member
Registered: 08/30/05
Posts: 70
|
Nah, I can list things that Country copied each other.
Buran vs U.S Shuttle Tu-144 vs Concord B1 vs Tu-160 MiG-25 vs F-15 MiG-15 vs F-86
Even USA B-2 Bomber derived idea from German aircraft the Horten Ho 229. Copying is nothing to be ashamed of. Copying good things and adapt to our own stuffs to make it better is intelligent.
btw: F-15 is more agile than the MiG-25 because they copied, then improved. And they copied the shape, not the size. Size is not important.
Edited by mirage2310 (08/23/10 01:06 AM)
_________________________
-- LQA --
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#3078817 - 08/23/10 11:31 AM
Re: LOOK AT THESE BOMBERS
[Re: mirage2310]
|
Working on it
Member
Registered: 07/31/06
Posts: 640
Loc: Barksdale AFB, La
|
Does it really matters if someone copies a aircraft design?
_________________________
6600 @ 2.4, Windows 7 64-bit, 4GB, 8800GT, CH HOTAS, TrackIR 5, Cougar MFD's
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#3078908 - 08/23/10 01:30 PM
Re: LOOK AT THESE BOMBERS
[Re: mirage2310]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 12/17/03
Posts: 3053
|
I think there are more aerodynamic differences between those two than you might glimpse at first sight. I imagine the wing profiles are not even close to similar, and let's not go into avionics or aircraft purpose  The shape can easily be coincidentally similar, but those two aircraft do not even share the same mission specifications. btw: F-15 is more agile than the MiG-25 because they copied, then improved. And they copied the shape, not the size. Size is not important.
_________________________
-- 44th VFW
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#3079050 - 08/23/10 06:13 PM
Re: LOOK AT THESE BOMBERS
[Re: jack72]
|
Senior Member
Registered: 04/11/02
Posts: 2994
Loc: Keller, TX
|
The F-86 and MiG-15 are definately not copies of each other. Except for the fact that they are both swept wing jets, there is no similarity in the two airplanes, whatsoever. Both owe their existence to captured Nazi swept wing research. However, airplane designers have been getting ideas from one another since airplanes first started flying. Hell, the worlds first fighter plane, the Fokker Eindecker, was an almost exact copy of the French Morane monoplane. The Fokker Triplane idea was copied from the British Sopwith design. Been going on ever since. And not just military types. Can't tell ya how many Piper Cub clones are out there!
_________________________
"From our orbital vantage point, we observe an earth without borders, full of peace, beauty and magnificence, and we pray that humanity as a whole can imagine a borderless world as we see it, and strive to live as one in peace." Astronaut William C. McCool RIP, January 29, 2003 - Space Shuttle Columbia
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |