Great article (giving FPS as a function of CPU speed). Really makes the point that once your CPU is "fast enough", making it twice as fast will not
usually make a "visible to the unaided eye" difference (or will barely do so).
A similar article showed that the $96 dual-core AMD Phenom II X2 550 3.1 GHz was "fast enough" (it was the GPU that made the difference). And, most all enthusiast quads are faster than that.
So, save money on the CPU, MB, memory -- and pour it into the GPU (as you said) -- has been vindicated in tests yet again

Of course, like all rules of thumb, there are occasional exceptions.
_________________________
ATI Sapphire HD7970 OC - Eyefinity 5760x1200 24", 1xDell-U2410 H-IPS + 2xHP-ZR24w S-IPS, Extended 23" Samsung cPVA, Ceton InfiniTV 4, Bulldozer FX8150@4.5GHz w/Swiftech Water Cooling, 16GB GSKILL PC3 @1866, ASUS Sabertooth 990FX, Corsair 120GB SSD, WDigital + 3x Seagate + Hitachi + 2x WD Ext = 10.0TB, Sony DVD, OCZ ZX 850W PSU, CoolerMaster HAF922, TM Warthog HOTAS, TM T-Flight Stick X, TM Cougar+FSSB & CH Pedals, Saitek X52 Pro & Pro Combat Pedals, TrackIR5 w/TC Pro, Windows 7 HP 64b