Forums » Air Combat & Civil Aviation » Rise of Flight - The First Great Air War » Should get ROF?


Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 >
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
Hop to:
#2904970 - 11/20/09 10:35 AM Should get ROF?
mash Offline
Junior Member

Registered: 01/02/09
Posts: 41
I am finally getting a new system. My question is should get ROF? Is it worth it? I have seen mixed reviews.

I want a realistic flight sim and I want to know if this will fit the bill? I am not new to flight sims so I would appreciate some honest feedback in terms of campaign, damage models, AI, etc...

Have the patches improved any of the earlier issues?

Thanks.

Top
#2904976 - 11/20/09 10:46 AM Re: Should get ROF? [Re: mash]
RocketDog Offline
Member

Registered: 05/20/03
Posts: 924
Loc: Bath, England
It's the most realistic flight sim to date in terms of flight model and "feel of flight". Needs a good system to get the best out of it. Patches are making real improvements every month.

There's a demo here you can try: http://riseofflight.com/en

Cheers,

RD.
_________________________
Beyond gliding distance

Top
#2904986 - 11/20/09 11:17 AM Re: Should get ROF? [Re: RocketDog]
J2_NigelMcElwee Offline
Member

Registered: 06/04/09
Posts: 386
Loc: Kennesaw, GA
I agree with rocket...the patches have brought the sim a loonggg way. with a good system you should get much enjoyment out of it. I play it everyday and there is always at least ONE moment that leaves my jaw dropping thinking "I cant believe how realistic this game is"

definately worth a shot and if you have the money pick up the camel and DR.I as well...both very challenging and rewarding aircraft.
_________________________
Oberleutnant
Adjutant, Jasta 2
http://jasta2.com
------------------------------------------------------------
EVGA X58 Classified board
Intel Core i7 975 Extreme Edition @ 4.2 ghz
Megahalems Rev. B Intel CPU Cooler
PNY GTX 580 oc'ed to 797/1594 263.09 WHQL
6 GB Corsair DDR3 oc'ed with xmp 1.2 profile
Obsidian Series 800D ATX Gaming Case
Samsung 24.6" @1920x1080

Top
#2904993 - 11/20/09 11:26 AM Re: Should get ROF? [Re: J2_NigelMcElwee]
womenfly2 Offline
Member

Registered: 02/22/09
Posts: 769
Loc: NH
Read this, should help you to decide: Convince Me!
_________________________
Gateway FX7026 Quad core 2.5GHz, 7.1 Audio, 8 gig ram
Windows 7 Professional 64-bit
Bose Champion-5 sound system
Samsung 2493HM LCD 24" monitor
NVIDIAŽ GeForceŽ GTS 250 w/ 1 GB GDDR3.
Direct X10
In the process of building a full size J3 Piper Cub! .. the L-4 version.

Top
#2905052 - 11/20/09 01:14 PM Re: Should get ROF? [Re: womenfly2]
mash Offline
Junior Member

Registered: 01/02/09
Posts: 41
Thanks. I will give it a try.

Does the multiplayer mostly dogfight or are there mission objectives?

Top
#2905070 - 11/20/09 01:44 PM Re: Should get ROF? [Re: mash]
SimonC Offline
Member

Registered: 06/12/09
Posts: 217
Loc: North of England
I think that you might care to buy the game, on the basis that you're supporting the flight sim/combat sim/WWI industry. I haven't bought yet. I tried the demo, which took some time to authenticate in order to fly, and found that the graphics were OKish - I was expecting a quantum leap from OFF but didn't get it (NB - I have an ATI graphics card) - and that the controls weren't quite what I expected, but that's hardly surprising in a new game.

Most of the demo download was relatively painless, apart from the half gig hit on my ISP download limit - thanks fellahs - but the online thing, whereby it mooches off to find the latest update and then downloads it pissed me off greatly. 300 meg of update for the limited life demo? That's just wrong.

My demo period - 72 hours I believe is what you get - is over, and RoF probably won't be heading towards our place soon, but that's because I have qualms about the permanent online status and the nature of the RoF campaign, and the period it currently covers. I may well pop back in due course and scam another 72 hour - wish it were more - demo through a different email address but until I hear from NeoQB that they have a campaign game that covers WWI rather than the last year of it I'm inclined to sit on my wallet.

Please see subsequent posts for further opinions.

Top
#2905109 - 11/20/09 02:25 PM Re: Should get ROF? [Re: SimonC]
RocketDog Offline
Member

Registered: 05/20/03
Posts: 924
Loc: Bath, England
Originally Posted By: SimonC
found that the graphics were OKish - I was expecting a quantum leap from OFF but didn't get it


I think it's got the edge on OFF. No slur on the OFF team, but the RoF engine is much more modern and can do a lot more.

Cheers,

RD.



_________________________
Beyond gliding distance

Top
#2905116 - 11/20/09 02:38 PM Re: Should get ROF? [Re: RocketDog]
SimonC Offline
Member

Registered: 06/12/09
Posts: 217
Loc: North of England
Hi RD,

"I think it's got the edge on OFF. No slur on the OFF team, but the RoF engine is much more modern and can do a lot more."

I'd agree if I had an Nvidia card I suspect, but I'm pushing my AGP based graphics rig to the limit with both OFF and ROF, and I'm hard pressed to see improvements. I'm sure it's the age of my PC (bought in 2006 and therefore obviously out of date), but that was my take.

I've simply reported my own experience of RoF as a demo, but I would urge the potential buyer to research very widely, particularly if they have a preference for an SP campaign.

Top
#2905188 - 11/20/09 04:51 PM Re: Should get ROF? [Re: mash]
WWBrian Offline
Member

Registered: 12/24/08
Posts: 2152
Originally Posted By: mash
I am finally getting a new system. My question is should get ROF? Is it worth it? I have seen mixed reviews.


"Worth" is very subjective. And is probably based on the amount of "disposable income" you have available. AT 30 dollars, it's half the price of other modern PC titles, with additional planes being less than the amount you'd pay going through a McDonalds drive-through.

Originally Posted By: mash
I want a realistic flight sim and I want to know if this will fit the bill?


Not only will it fit the bill, but I would go so far as to say it will be the most realistic flight model from PC software you have ever flown!!

Originally Posted By: mash
I am not new to flight sims so I would appreciate some honest feedback in terms of campaign,


Current ( and previous versions of ) ROF appears to be made more for the MMO Flight-Sim crowd, such as Aces High, Warbirds, etc... it is not a WW1 Pilot Carreer simulation/RPG (such as Red Baron), you don't track/assign pilots, you don't transfer to other squadrons, you FLY. As one may expect in a flight simulator. ROF tracks your missions flown, your kills, kill/death ratio, bullets fired...and other statistics you may (or may not) find interesting.

Current campaigns are pretty much a string of canned missions...but developers have said that the SP campaign is being enhanced.

Additionally, PatrickAWilson is currently making a java applet that adds "RPG-type" features to Rise of Flight, and you can look at that in THIS THREAD.


Originally Posted By: mash
damage models,


While all games have the need to drop some realism for game-play's sake, ROF's DM is still by far the best I've seen! It has it's limitations and apparent sillyness in some situations (flying with wings only between center struts). But even with these limitations, it's still far better than anything else you will see.

Originally Posted By: mash
AI, etc...


The AI is good! It used to be better, but the community pitched a fit, and so they dumbed it down (a testimate to how the developers have their ear to the community). Bad move in my opinion to lower the AI, but looking at the bright side, you'll get shot down less when you are a beginner. But I suspect the AI will get boring faster for you now.

Originally Posted By: mash
Have the patches improved any of the earlier issues?

Thanks.


So far, we've seen ROF getting updated once a month. Each patch brings many bug fixes, a few new features, and two additional planes.


My biggest gripe with Rise of Flight is the configuration process. It can be very counter-intuative! But this too is being updated.

I'd get the demo, and get it all set up BEFORE you register it, that way you can spend 72 hours flying it instead of configuring it!


HAVE FUN!

_________________________
WingWalker (virtual) Combat Squadron

Intel i7 980X @3.8 GHz | ASUS P6X58D Premium | Antec 1200w PSU | 12GB 1600Mhz RAM
SLI - 2x eVGA GTX 580 3072MB vRAM | Dell 3007WFP 30" + 2x Dell 2007FP 20" @ 5388x1600 res.
Corsair Force GT 240GB SSD - O/S drive | Corsair Force 60GB SSD - ROF drive
WD VelociRaptor 300GB - Game drive | WD Black 1TB - Storage drive
CH HOTAS and TrackIR 5 +TCP | Realtek on-board sound | Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit


Top
#2905198 - 11/20/09 04:59 PM Re: Should get ROF? [Re: WWBrian]
WWBrian Offline
Member

Registered: 12/24/08
Posts: 2152
LMAO Simon,

Quote:

in order to fly, and found that the graphics were OKish - I was expecting a quantum leap from OFF but didn't get it


So, are you attempting to say ROF graphics are NOT a quantum leap ahead of OFF then?

Quote:

but I'm pushing my AGP based graphics rig to the limit with both OFF and ROF


HAAHAA! OMG! That's too funny!


...and I won't even mention why your arm hurts, it's pretty obvious why! No doctor needed! hahaha
_________________________
WingWalker (virtual) Combat Squadron

Intel i7 980X @3.8 GHz | ASUS P6X58D Premium | Antec 1200w PSU | 12GB 1600Mhz RAM
SLI - 2x eVGA GTX 580 3072MB vRAM | Dell 3007WFP 30" + 2x Dell 2007FP 20" @ 5388x1600 res.
Corsair Force GT 240GB SSD - O/S drive | Corsair Force 60GB SSD - ROF drive
WD VelociRaptor 300GB - Game drive | WD Black 1TB - Storage drive
CH HOTAS and TrackIR 5 +TCP | Realtek on-board sound | Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit


Top
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 >
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
Hop to:

Moderator:  EinsteinEP 

Forum Use Agreement | Privacy Statement | SimHQ Staff
Copyright 1997-2012, SimHQ Inc. All Rights Reserved.