So it begins. The controversy has already started to grow over the "LEVEL" in MW2. I'm curious what everyone here thinks about it.

I personally chose to play the level when given the choice at the beginning of the game and after going through it, I hoinestly don't have a problem with it. I did feel funny being part of it because I usually do not like GTA type games so I actually went through most of it without firing a shot (until I had to toward the end of it) but it is just an event that makes sense in the overall picture of the story to me. It adds shock value (especially at the end of it) and it makes me want to get at the enemy even more.

Although I never play games whose goal is to attack innocents, cops, etc. I don't actually see this as the same thing because it was just a small portion of the game and IW chose to make us part of the action instead of making us watch a long cutscene.

That's my 2 cents.

I started it and ended up skipping it a few minutes in.

I decided to still get the game. When I got to that mission I started it, afraid I'd miss some important info, but as soon as they started opening up on the people, it was skip and move on time for me. Not going to play that. But I do have a question for those who have played through or know but its a spoiler question:


p.s. The mountain mission with your old character Soap is stinkin' cool.

I did fail the mission once for putting about 60 rounds in Makarov's back.

I will probably play it on another play through to find out the answer to Coot's question but due to recent events it was just too much right now.

Yes the mountain mission was awesome.

@ kramer

Thanks for answering Coot's question but I have a question. How do you reply with a "Show Me" box to prevent spoilers? I tries to respond but couldn't figure it out and therefore said nothing. I figured that was better than posting a portion of the story all over the board.

Put the text in spoiler tags, if you quote his message you'll be able to see them.

@ Jeevz