Forums » Air Combat & Civil Aviation » European Air War » 1.28c Question...


Topic Options
Rate This Topic
Hop to:
#2894042 - 11/03/09 07:55 PM 1.28c Question...
Skylark Online   content
ImagePoster & HRSkinner
Hotshot

Registered: 02/14/01
Posts: 6823
Loc: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
I've been testing SPAW with 1.28c exe.
I've read the 'readme' of 1.28c exe that mentions additional aircraft info...



Could someone from the Code Group explain what the figures
in the upper righthand corner of this screen shot mean...

Cheers mates pilot
David
_________________________
"Yet, I shall endure the darkness....because it shows me the stars"

http://www.sandbagger.uk.com/skylark.html

Top
#2894058 - 11/03/09 08:40 PM Re: 1.28c Question... [Re: Skylark]
MrJelly Online   content
Hotshot

Registered: 04/30/02
Posts: 5733
Loc: Caux L'Herault, France
Ralf will explain the best altitude settings, but the framerate, mass in kG/lbs, and indicated airspeed in mph/kmph are self explanatory.
The mass values were really useful to us when we had a fuel burn rate 10x larger than it should have been for the Typhoon and P47C in the 1.28b release (as we could not see the last "0" in the planes.dat editor LOL), and we could see the mass dropping very quickly.

Jel
_________________________
Install 1.28E (XP/Vista/Win7) and fly online or off with it.

The best EAW online games are at GameRanger:
http://www.gameranger.com/


Downloads from my site:
My new webpage

Teamspeak 3 channel: 62.48.74.45:8769

Now you can join a running game, and even use a second controller smile


Top
#2894149 - 11/04/09 02:22 AM Re: 1.28c Question... [Re: MrJelly]
Knegel Offline
Hotshot

Registered: 08/14/01
Posts: 8276
Hi,

the best alt values are related to the two possible supercharger stages.

best Alt 1: current best Height(rated height, highest power) of the 1st supercharger stage in feet
best Alt 2: current best Height(rated hight, highest power) of the 2nd supercharger stage in feet
best Alt diff: altitude difference to the current supercharger switch height in feet
(when this value is = 0, you be in the current supercharger switch height, often the worst power)

Like in reality this heights are in big degrees related to the current plane speed(ram air effect).

As such you will take notice that the height vary with the speed.

In older FM´s, also still in SPAW, no 2nd supercharger stage got implemented for now, so the 1st supercharger height is = 0 and also the switch height is close to zero.

So in EAW1.28c the rated altitude change with the plane speed, what is another very ealistic aspect of aircombat with piston engines.

Important to know is that the engines wont overheat if the plane is a little above the current rated altitude. This is so cause above rated altitude the engines cant get loaded with the full presure anymore, as such the engine run more cool.

So if a plane have two supercharger stages, there is a altitude band, above the 1st rated alt and below the supercharger switch height, where the engine wont overheat and then again above the 2nd rated alt.


Greetings,

Knegel
_________________________
1st engined flight by Richard Pearse, Waitohi, New Zealand, March 31, 1902. Karl Jatho, 1st flight, 18.August 1903, Hannover-Vahrenheide, real controlled flights.
The Wrights, 1st flight, 17. December 1903. They wasnt the 1st, but still claim this!

Top
#2894197 - 11/04/09 05:06 AM Re: 1.28c Question... [Re: Knegel]
Crashin' Jack Offline
Senior Member

Registered: 10/02/03
Posts: 2914
Loc: Illinois
That's pretty cool having that info handy, Knegel. Nice work!
_________________________
"Blasts from clustered R4M quartets in my snout
And see these English planes go burn...." Blue Oyster Cult

EAW 1.28d 1024 EXE file available here:
http://www.sandbagger.uk.com/EAWNewFront3.html

My other EAW mods available here:
http://www.sandbagger.uk.com/crashinjack.html

Top
#2894228 - 11/04/09 06:32 AM Re: 1.28c Question... [Re: Crashin' Jack]
Skylark Online   content
ImagePoster & HRSkinner
Hotshot

Registered: 02/14/01
Posts: 6823
Loc: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Thanks Ralf,

Having these info figures available to the pilot is a really nice little feature of 1.28c

Cheers mate pilot
David
_________________________
"Yet, I shall endure the darkness....because it shows me the stars"

http://www.sandbagger.uk.com/skylark.html

Top
#2894277 - 11/04/09 07:47 AM Re: 1.28c Question... [Re: Skylark]
Knegel Offline
Hotshot

Registered: 08/14/01
Posts: 8276
btw, look to the weight while you push the gun trigger. wink

The EAW1.28c flightmodel also take the amunition weight into account. wink

So a FW190A without amo is around 250kg less heavy and it will perform like that. wink
The P47 is around 450kg less heavy without amo, while the 109G6(clean) just carry around 90kg amo and the Spit1a just around 75kg. smile

So depending to the current fuel and amo load the performence relation between different planes might vary much.

Greetings,

Knegel
_________________________
1st engined flight by Richard Pearse, Waitohi, New Zealand, March 31, 1902. Karl Jatho, 1st flight, 18.August 1903, Hannover-Vahrenheide, real controlled flights.
The Wrights, 1st flight, 17. December 1903. They wasnt the 1st, but still claim this!

Top
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
Hop to:

Moderator:  sandbagger 

Forum Use Agreement | Privacy Statement | SimHQ Staff
Copyright 1997-2011, SimHQ Inc. All Rights Reserved.