Forums » Air Combat & Civil Aviation » Over Flanders Fields » Extremely Disappointed with RoF...
SimHQ Homepage Forums Main Page Articles Library News Archive Forums Archive Mark All Forums Read Who's Online Community Links
Register User Active Topics Calendar Downloads FAQ Library Multiplayer News Release Dates SimHQ TV


Page 3 of 10 < 1 2 3 4 5 ... 9 10 >
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
Hop to:
#2853905 - 09/03/09 10:33 AM Re: Extremely Disappointed with RoF... [Re: catch]
Brigstock Offline
Member

Registered: 12/30/00
Posts: 2489
Loc: London, England
Originally Posted By: catch

RoF on the other hand is beginning to leave a nasty taste for many here at simhq. I'm not sure if the Russian devs even care. They certainly don't seem to. It's like they've gone into their shell ignoring the west as being too troublesome and concentrating only on the Russian/Eastern Europe market. Arrogance perhaps ? Inexperience ? I don't know. They're just not communicating apart from the odd token effort to keep the faith basically but meaningless otherwise. It's wearing thin.


Not a totally fair statement

I've not seen any real preferences shown to east or west. It's a global market and we are all getting patched and aircraft at the same time. All communication via the blog is produced in Russian and English at the same time.
The ROF website has plenty of updates and the forum regularly has the devs posting in it.

RoF isn't perfect by a long way but neither is OFF. What OFF lacks RoF makes up for it. What RoF lacks OFF makes up for it.

Horses and courses I suppose.
_________________________
Brigstock

Top
#2854446 - 09/04/09 05:10 AM Re: Extremely Disappointed with RoF... [Re: Brigstock]
SimonC Offline
Member

Registered: 06/12/09
Posts: 210
Loc: North of England
"The ROF website has plenty of updates and the forum regularly has the devs posting in it."

I suspect they'd make a lot more friends and soothe some ruffled feathers if the posted on SimHQ!

Top
#2854496 - 09/04/09 06:36 AM Re: Extremely Disappointed with RoF... [Re: Brigstock]
Plainsman Offline
Senior Member

Registered: 04/03/02
Posts: 2791
Originally Posted By: Brigstock
Originally Posted By: catch

RoF on the other hand is beginning to leave a nasty taste for many here at simhq. I'm not sure if the Russian devs even care. They certainly don't seem to. It's like they've gone into their shell ignoring the west as being too troublesome and concentrating only on the Russian/Eastern Europe market. Arrogance perhaps ? Inexperience ? I don't know. They're just not communicating apart from the odd token effort to keep the faith basically but meaningless otherwise. It's wearing thin.


Not a totally fair statement

I've not seen any real preferences shown to east or west. It's a global market and we are all getting patched and aircraft at the same time. All communication via the blog is produced in Russian and English at the same time.
The ROF website has plenty of updates and the forum regularly has the devs posting in it.

RoF isn't perfect by a long way but neither is OFF. What OFF lacks RoF makes up for it. What RoF lacks OFF makes up for it.

Horses and courses I suppose.


"Horses and courses"? This is not an expression known to native born and raised folks in the United States. Does it have the same meaning as "six of one, half a dozen of the other?" If not, please translate.


Edited by Plainsman (09/04/09 06:38 AM)
Top
#2854504 - 09/04/09 06:55 AM Re: Extremely Disappointed with RoF... [Re: Plainsman]
Jeevz Offline
Duke of URL
Veteran

Registered: 08/06/03
Posts: 10921
Loc: Atlanta, GA
More like "different strokes for different folks"
_________________________
Commence to Jigglin'

XBL/PSN/GFWL: Jeevz74

Top
#2854541 - 09/04/09 07:40 AM Re: Extremely Disappointed with RoF... [Re: Jeevz]
Counterman Offline
Member

Registered: 04/07/08
Posts: 811
Loc: Wisconsin, USA
Point is rather simple really:

I bought RoF expecting it to be a WWI Historical Combat Flight Simulator. Oh it's indeed a good flight simulator for WWI aircraft, I even get to shoot stuff, but it's hardly what I expected.

OFF is a WWI Historical Combat Flight Simulator, which is exactly what I wanted. Lots of planes, skins, awesome terrain, and a rewarding experience.

If RoF ever has half the content that OFF does, I'll start to give it more respect as a WWI Combat Flight Simulator. I should be able to fire up RoF, start a campaign, and without realizing it 3 hours have gone by. I get that with OFF.
_________________________
From time to time I take a half decent photograph, let me know what you think: http://www.flickr.com/photos/26871905@N06/

Top
#2854829 - 09/04/09 01:46 PM Re: Extremely Disappointed with RoF... [Re: Plainsman]
Brigstock Offline
Member

Registered: 12/30/00
Posts: 2489
Loc: London, England
Originally Posted By: Plainsman
Originally Posted By: Brigstock


Horses and courses I suppose.


"Horses and courses"? This is not an expression known to native born and raised folks in the United States. Does it have the same meaning as "six of one, half a dozen of the other?" If not, please translate.


It's referencing an English saying. "horses for courses", taken from the sport of Kings, horse racing
Adopted into the english vernacular, meaning choosing something to perform something specific.

ie: I use OFF for offline campaigning and RoF for Online and quick dogfights. A "different horse for each different course"
_________________________
Brigstock

Top
#2854881 - 09/04/09 02:57 PM Re: Extremely Disappointed with RoF... [Re: Brigstock]
Counterman Offline
Member

Registered: 04/07/08
Posts: 811
Loc: Wisconsin, USA
Originally Posted By: Brigstock
Originally Posted By: Plainsman
Originally Posted By: Brigstock


Horses and courses I suppose.


"Horses and courses"? This is not an expression known to native born and raised folks in the United States. Does it have the same meaning as "six of one, half a dozen of the other?" If not, please translate.


It's referencing an English saying. "horses for courses", taken from the sport of Kings, horse racing
Adopted into the english vernacular, meaning choosing something to perform something specific.

ie: I use OFF for offline campaigning and RoF for Online and quick dogfights. A "different horse for each different course"


You Brits are weird. wink

I'll be honest, I never heard the saying before, but the longer version I have heard similar.
_________________________
From time to time I take a half decent photograph, let me know what you think: http://www.flickr.com/photos/26871905@N06/

Top
#2854907 - 09/04/09 03:32 PM Re: Extremely Disappointed with RoF... [Re: Counterman]
Ivan Putski Offline
Hotshot

Registered: 10/29/01
Posts: 9077
Loc: Memphis, Tn. U.S.A.
The Yank term is Mudders, and Fodders, and that`s old school. Puts biggrin
_________________________
"Is he?....Yeah....Nothings moving but,his watch"

Ivan
"Half Bader"
Putski

Top
#2855240 - 09/05/09 07:51 AM Re: Extremely Disappointed with RoF... [Re: Counterman]
rabu Offline
Member

Registered: 08/02/04
Posts: 1679
Loc: California, USA
tit for tac

apples for oranges or an apples to apples comparison

point by point

eye for an eye

Interesting.. What are some other phrases like this?
_________________________
rabu ...[|8~'

Windows XP Pro SP3
Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 2.4ghz
Gigabyte GA-EP45-DS3R NorthBridge P45E MOB
Patriot 4gb DDR2 800 SDRAM
XFX GeForce GTS250 1gb w/22" LCD 1680x1050 32x dpi96
SB X-Fi audio card
Antec Trio TP3-650
3 WD 7200rpm 3GB/Sec SATA drives


Top
#2856541 - 09/07/09 03:50 PM Re: Extremely Disappointed with RoF... [Re: rabu]
Plainsman Offline
Senior Member

Registered: 04/03/02
Posts: 2791
Puts, never heard of that expression. What part of Yankeeland are you from?

Top
Page 3 of 10 < 1 2 3 4 5 ... 9 10 >
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
Hop to:


Forum Use Agreement | Privacy Statement | SimHQ Staff
Copyright 1997-2011, SimHQ Inc. All Rights Reserved.