Well Sim, if you're lucky, you won't have to worry about it.
One of the reasons supposely stated in making a UAV track was to build experience in operations. Make 'old heads' if you will in pilots who have been in UAVs from the time they graduated pilot training. Not so much in how to 'fly' the thing, but how to employ it, tactics, etc.
The manning issue was so bad for a while that the USAF was taking folks with less than 200 hours in their MWS and pulling them into UAVs with no intention of going back to your MWS.
The USAF for a while was also wanting pilots because of what the article says, that sort of airsense you get from operating an aircraft over time. Also, there are some SIGNIFICANT issues with operating UAVs in controlled airspace...stuff that makes me even more leery of EVER setting pilotless aircraft anywhere near me, no matter what Beach says. However, this flies in the face of using 200 hour brand new 2Lts with no real time to operate UAVs.
The USAF has finally had reality give them a slap in the face to learn that A) You don't need real pilots to operate UAVs if you keep the UAVs to a controlled enviroment and B) No real pilot wants to fly UAVs unless they have to for other reasons. There was an especially dishearning incident where a T-38 track student, got a UAV assignment on drop night and promptly SIEed from training. Think about that a minute...less than 2 weeks from graduation, all his checkrides complete and he quits after a YEAR of some of the hardest training you will ever go through.
There is a serious move afoot to revamp USAF pilot training because of the aforementioned UAV manning (pulling it out of traditional pilot training and make a totally separate track) and because the advanced trainers are not getting any younger. The T-38C is 50 (yes FIFTY) years old and the T-1A is wearing out faster than anticipated (go figure, take a bizjet and smash it repeatedly on the runway might do that). The serious considerations include getting rid of the dual track system (in other words EVERYONE goes through T-38s/T-X again), and possibly, lengthing the T-6 syllabus and shorten the advanced syllabus to more specific options.
Personally, I have no problem flying a UAV for a single tour...almost all pilots now have a tour outside their MWS, no matter if it's being a staff weenie, a 'white jet' instructor, play Army for a while, etc. You simply make it another alpha tour and call it good. But having a permanent UAV track as a pilot? Pfffft...please.
FC
_________________________
"There is always hope. Only because it's the one thing that no one has figured out how to kill yet." - #%&*$#
http://mistercheeks.blogspot.com