#2783528 - 12/24/06 12:25 PM
Re: Airco DH.2 up now at CombatAce
|
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 7,064
Sandbagger
Hotshot
|
Hotshot
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 7,064
Coningsby, Lincs, UK
|
Hi John, A really detailed and great model, but like others, I suffer a frame rate drop in external and sometimes internal views. The resize of BMPs to 512 didn't help. However, the changing of the LOD 1 file to 1 does cure the problem. The trouble is it removes all fine detail from external views, such as the engine, propellor, riggng, gun, tail skid etc. This doesn't appear to be a problem with the other models, although most do not have the extensive rigging associated with the DH2.
It seems such a pity to have to effectively delete these details after you put in so much hard work creating them in the first place.
Anyway, she still looks great from the cockpit, and I guess that's where it really matters.
Thanks once again for the DH2.
Alienware Aurora R5 Windows 10 64 bit Intel i7-6700K 4.2Ghz Two GTX 1080 Foundations in SLI (8 Gig each) 32 Gig DDR4 2133Mhz 1TB SSD boot drive - 1TB SATA storage drive 5.1 Surround Sound 34" Dell Ultra Sharp U3415W (3440x 2440) CH Pro-Pedals, Stick and Throttle TrackIR-5 Pro
|
|
#2783532 - 12/27/06 04:11 PM
Re: Airco DH.2 up now at CombatAce
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 11
geezer
Junior Member
|
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 11
|
I'm new at FE, but I like it despite some rough edges that should get smoothed out with time, patches, and mods. I'm a life-long aviation history buff (and occasional modder) so I would like to make a few observations in response to some of the other posts here.
1916 aircraft are definately for the hard-core FE enthusiasts and I love the DH2. Considering the number of 1916 enthusiasts are likely to be small, AND the time and effort required to produce a new aircraft for the sim, why not take a kind of "cost-effective" approach? Instead of producing the obvious compliment for the DH2 - the Fokker E1/E2 - why not devote the time and effort to aircraft that had a more realistic performance and can be used over a longer time-span. The Fokker Eindecker was a very mediocre aircraft that is remembered primarily for it's armament, and was soon withdrawn from service when the Allies introduced the DH2 and Nieuport 11. Other German aircraft were introduced in 1916, contemporary with the DH2, that were more successful than the Fokker and served for much longer (because of their success).
While my personal favorite would be the Halberstadt D2, the best use of a modders' limited time would be to produce the Albatross D1/D2/D3 series. They used used fundamentally the same fuselage, armament, and powerplant so it would require less time to produce the necessary 3D models, texture maps, and associated files. Also, the D2 served into 1917 while the D3 served well into 1918, so the models could be spread over many different missions and color schemes, in contrast to the Fokker Eindecker. The same approach could be taken with a number of German two-seaters, such as the early Aviatik and Albatross designs.
This would result in worthy opponents for the DH2 that were both historically accurate AND could be used against other Allied aircraft for 1917 and 1918. In effect - more bang for the buck!
|
|
#2783533 - 12/27/06 05:45 PM
Re: Airco DH.2 up now at CombatAce
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,475
Uriah
Senior Member
|
Senior Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,475
Kansas City, Missouri - USA
|
I have a few photos of this plane (I think it is this plane) from the WWI museum in Kansas City.
Race you to the Mucky Duck!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exodus
by RedOneAlpha. 04/18/24 05:46 PM
|
|