|
|
#124721 - 10/21/06 02:10 PM
Re: RAM Benchmarks: the effect of 512MB, 1024MB, and 2048MB of memory
|
Member
Registered: 04/12/00
Posts: 1612
Loc: United Kingdom
|
Interesting results though I would back up Gatticus on the difference seen on a friends system load timesfor BF2 though actual FPS increase was hardly noticeable. I've also seen some say WWIIOL runs a lot better once you go beyond 1GB, I'd like to see if thats true.
_________________________
Revvin The CH Hangar - Profiles, news and help for CH users
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#124722 - 10/21/06 09:00 PM
Re: RAM Benchmarks: the effect of 512MB, 1024MB, and 2048MB of memory
|
Member
Registered: 12/29/00
Posts: 715
Loc: everywhere
|
nice article.
i was thinking of increasing my 1gb ram to 2 gb, but might hold off a little longer now.
_________________________
Be advised, we got zips in the wire
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#124724 - 10/22/06 09:23 AM
Re: RAM Benchmarks: the effect of 512MB, 1024MB, and 2048MB of memory
|
Member
Registered: 04/01/02
Posts: 452
Loc: Va, U.S.
|
Originally posted by WalterNowi: Joe, Interesting results. I am wondering what the results would look like for:
2 x 512 MB @1T versus 2 x 1024 MB @1T I would also like to see this. Especially the 2x1gb test vs 4x512.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#124725 - 10/22/06 10:20 PM
Re: RAM Benchmarks: the effect of 512MB, 1024MB, and 2048MB of memory
|
Forums Manager
Hotshot
Registered: 06/28/01
Posts: 8903
Loc: Fort Wayne, Indiana, USA
|
About the rFactor 1150 load time, I have 2x512 (P4 3.6G) and am seeing anywhere from a minute to 1:20 to load from desktop to main menu. I think it's due more to the sim searching for servers before starting. Was your test done offline? 
_________________________
"Cave Putorium!" SoWW #2485
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#124726 - 10/23/06 07:12 AM
Re: RAM Benchmarks: the effect of 512MB, 1024MB, and 2048MB of memory
|
Veteran
Registered: 04/05/02
Posts: 17731
Loc: Bridgewater, NJ
|
Originally posted by WalterNowi: I am wondering what the results would look like for:
2 x 512 MB @1T versus 2 x 1024 MB @1T Sorry, my motherboard (Asrock 939Dual-SATAII) will only run memory at -2T timing. Originally posted by Weasel_Keeper: About the rFactor 1150 load time, I have 2x512 (P4 3.6G) and am seeing anywhere from a minute to 1:20 to load from desktop to main menu. I think it's due more to the sim searching for servers before starting.
Was your test done offline?
No, my test was done online. AFAIK rFactor doesn't search for servers until you click the "JOIN" button to see the server list. rFactor does check in with the Matchmaker service when it starts, however, so your long load times could be due to this.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#124727 - 10/23/06 07:18 AM
Re: RAM Benchmarks: the effect of 512MB, 1024MB, and 2048MB of memory
|
Entil'zha
Big Kahuna
Registered: 02/15/00
Posts: 32845
Loc: Space Coast, USA
|
I think rFactor's load time, like the SFP series, is also dictated by the number of mods in the game. The more you have, the longer the load time. Another thing that's not covered here is in some games you use more RAM as time goes on. I'd say a good third of my games will use 1200-1400MB of RAM, like RO. If you have only 1GB, that means swapfile use at some point. Whether reflected in longer loading times once in the game, or pauses/stutters at other points depends on the game situation.
I remember CFS3 is one where each new plane loaded increases the RAM footprint. I have over 100 planes in the game, and if I sit in the main screen, where the pilot lounges by his plane, and just switch from plane to plane to plane, by the time I reach 40 planes or so the game is pushing 2GB RAM used.
The Jedi Master
_________________________
Back off, man. I'm a scientist.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#124728 - 10/23/06 12:30 PM
Re: RAM Benchmarks: the effect of 512MB, 1024MB, and 2048MB of memory
|
Member
Registered: 01/30/01
Posts: 862
|
Nice write-up, Joe.
_________________________
Space for rent.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#124729 - 10/27/06 09:56 PM
Re: RAM Benchmarks: the effect of 512MB, 1024MB, and 2048MB of memory
|
Hotshot
Registered: 11/23/05
Posts: 6265
Loc: Edgewood TX
|
Interesting. I would think that the load placed on the PSU would be greater for 2G vs 1G even if the 2G was not being fully used? I've read on some forums of some PSUs that were borderline not being able to handle 2G of ram especially if it is 4x512.
_________________________
MSI P55-GD65 with i5-750 @ 4.0Ghz vcore 1.370 Xigmatek Balder HS/2 120mm fans, Antec EW PSU EA750 750W GSKILL Ripjaws 2x4Gb DDR3 1333 One 1Tb Seagate 12 32Mb, two 1.5Tb LP Seagates Gigabyte GTX 460 1Gb OC to within an inch of it's life Lite-On 24X DVD burner, LG 12X Blu-Ray burner COOLER MASTER Storm Scout Win 7 Pro 64 Lots of fans spinning with little LED lights blinking www.razzledazzleart.comhttp://texascbx.blogspot.com/
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#124730 - 11/24/06 01:51 PM
Re: RAM Benchmarks: the effect of 512MB, 1024MB, and 2048MB of memory
|
Member
Registered: 10/30/06
Posts: 173
|
Originally posted by Joe: 1x512MB (512MB total), 400 MHz, 2.5-3-3-11-2T: 26 seconds 2x512MB (1024MB total), 400 MHz, 2.5-3-3-11-2T: 11 seconds ... 1x512MB (512MB total), 400 MHz, 2.5-3-3-11-2T: 53 seconds 2x512MB (1024MB total), 400 MHz, 2.5-3-3-11-2T: 21 seconds
Errr...most of the tests show a pretty massive jump right here, but...are you SURE it's the 'going from 512mb to 1gb of ram'? I mean, the Opteron you tested with is dual-channel. Going from one stick to two sticks *doubles* the memory bandwidth (IE., 1x512mb PC3200 = 3.2gb/s bandwidth theoretical. 2x512mb PC3200 = 6.4gb/s bandwidth theoretical.) Surely, that would make an ENORMOUS difference in performance, no? Wouldn't a better test of 512mb have been to do 2x256mb?
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |