Originally Posted By: SkateZilla
...Hence the $5000 Price tag of GP100, they simply have no yields w/ the 610+mm^2 Die, .. there arent enough working samples, and the cost of the working samples.



Nvidia went that path once before (a few years back), as I remember it. They only managed a couple thousand GPUs that worked. They sold them to the public at a loss -- so they could continue to advertise that "Nvidia was the fastest".

Of course, lately they've been doing well.

Meantime, AMD said years ago, they would make fast cards. However, it was pointless to compete for the "fastest card on the market" with Nvidia because Nvidia would "do whatever necessary and spend whatever necessary" to produce the fastest card and win. "Fastest" has always been the "bedrock" of Nvidia GPU brand recognition. If Nvidia's fastest card isn't the fastest made, they really screwed up (or AMD did really good).


Sapphire Pulse RX7900XTX, 3 monitors = 23P (1080p) + SAMSUNG 32" Odyssey Neo G7 1000R curve (4K/2160p) + 23P (1080p), AMD R9-7950X (ARCTIC Liquid Freezer II 420), 64GB RAM@6.0GHz, Gigabyte X670E AORUS MASTER MB, (4x M.2 SSD + 2xSSD + 2xHD) = ~52TB storage, EVGA 1600W PSU, Phanteks Enthoo Pro Full Tower, ASUS RT-AX89X 6000Mbps WiFi router, VKB Gladiator WW2 Stick, Pedals, G.Skill RGB KB, AORUS Thunder M7 Mouse, W11 Pro